Browse
Search
Minutes 05-14-2024 - Budget Public Hearing and Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2024
>
Minutes 05-14-2024 - Budget Public Hearing and Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2024 3:57:24 PM
Creation date
6/20/2024 3:37:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/14/2024
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda 05-14-24; 4 - Amendments to Rules of Procedure for Hybrid and Remote Meetings
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 05-14-2024 Budget Public Hearing and Work Session
Agenda 05-14-24; 5 - Affordable Housing Advisory Board – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 05-14-2024 Budget Public Hearing and Work Session
Agenda 05-14-24; 6 - Alcoholic Beverage Control Board – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 05-14-2024 Budget Public Hearing and Work Session
Agenda 05-14-24; 7 - Durham Technical Community College Board of Trustees – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 05-14-2024 Budget Public Hearing and Work Session
Agenda 05-14-24; 8 - Orange County Board of Adjustment – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 05-14-2024 Budget Public Hearing and Work Session
Agenda 05-14-24; 9 - Orange Water and Sewer Authority Board of Directors – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 05-14-2024 Budget Public Hearing and Work Session
Agenda for May 14, 2024 Budget-CIP Public Hearing & Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 05-14-2024 Budget Public Hearing and Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> ■ Could a member of the public participate/speak remotely during a remote or hybrid <br /> meeting? <br /> ■ What do other North Carolina counties allow? <br /> Laura Jensen said this was an opportunity for the Board to discuss the possibility of <br /> conducting remote and/or hybrid meetings. <br /> John Roberts said state statutes do allow for electronic meetings, but they do not specify <br /> what electronic meetings are. He said the statutes do not provide any rules. He said that during <br /> the pandemic, the legislature came up with a very detailed overview of remote meetings, but one <br /> provision specifies that it is only allowed during a declared emergency. He said that that rule also <br /> did not invalidate electronic meetings, whatever those are. He said that the Board can set the <br /> rules for what an electronic meeting outside of a state of emergency may be and he can provide <br /> guidance. <br /> Chair Bedford asked if by electronic meetings, John Roberts meant hybrid meetings. <br /> John Roberts said it can be and that electronic meeting would mean remote attendance, <br /> but it is not a remote meeting under the declaration of emergency statute. <br /> Chair Bedford asked if they can be 100% remote. <br /> John Roberts said that he does not recommend a fully remote hybrid meeting and that <br /> four people be present as a physical quorum. He said if the Board wants to have a fully remote <br /> electronic meeting there could be legal liability if they are making decisions on substantive topics <br /> like the budget. <br /> Vice-Chair Greene asked if there is a quorum of four people physically present and three <br /> people who are remote, if the three people get to vote. <br /> John Roberts said if they set the rules to allow that, then yes. He said that his <br /> recommendation is to not allow business meetings to be remote because there is no case law, <br /> and no judge has interpreted what that means. <br /> Chair Bedford said she had forwarded to the Board information on what the Town of <br /> Hillsborough had adopted, and the School of Government has agreed with the policy. She said <br /> that business, or voting meetings, could not be 100% remote. <br /> Commissioner Fowler asked if other counties are holding remote meetings. <br /> Laura Jensen said three counties are allowing some sort of remote participation and only <br /> shared any rules for that participation. <br /> Commissioner Fowler asked if they allow any remote participation. <br /> Laura Jensen said that Wayne County's rule is that a majority of the Board of <br /> Commissioners must vote at that meeting to allow the person to attend remotely. <br /> Chair Bedford asked if Durham and Alexander allow it. <br /> Laura Jensen said that Durham and Alexander allow it, but there are no guidelines. <br /> Commissioner Richards said that currently the rules only allow a remote commissioner to <br /> watch but not participate. She said that she thinks if they are having a decision-making meeting, <br /> then they do not need to be hybrid because she worries about that. She also said that she would <br /> want advance notice if a commissioner was not going to be in physical attendance. <br /> Chair Bedford reviewed the questions she had and the order in which she thought the <br /> Board could discuss the topic. She said they needed to determine what type of meetings they <br /> could conduct as hybrid meetings. She said then they could determine how many people could <br /> be remote; should a commissioner sign up in advance; would it be considered first come, first <br /> serve; how many hours in advance should the request be made; how many times per month or <br /> year would it be allowed; could the County Manager, County Attorney, or Clerk to the Board be <br /> remote; would the public be allowed to give comments remotely, which would only apply during <br /> business meetings; and that they need to be careful for certain public hearings that involve federal <br /> funds. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.