Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-18-2024; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
Agenda - 06-18-2024 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 06-18-2024; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2024 2:43:32 PM
Creation date
6/13/2024 2:06:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/18/2024
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for June 18, 2024 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2024\Agenda - 06-18-2024 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br /> 1 Slide #35 <br /> Policies to Test: <br /> Lowering densities to protect priority agricultural, <br /> environmental, watershed, and rural lands <br /> Assumption that new affordable/denser housing is <br /> accommodated within the municipalities <br /> - Could also eliminate the Rural Community Activity <br /> ■�■ Nodes that are not currently developed <br /> i <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Commissioner Hamilton asked for a definition of Rural Community Activity Node. <br /> 4 Tom Altieri said that it is land focused on the designated road intersections that serve as <br /> 5 a nodal crossroads for the surrounding rural community and is an appropriate location for any of <br /> 6 the following uses: church, fire station, small post office, school, or other similar institutional uses <br /> 7 and one or more commercial uses. <br /> 8 Leigh Anne King said this is a very common thing they do when they work with counties. <br /> 9 She said when they update older plans, the communities found the nodes and said it would be a <br /> 10 great opportunity. She said that the market has not really met the plan and now the review is more <br /> 11 about questioning if the nodes are still in an appropriate location. <br /> 12 Tom Altieri said there are 5 of these nodes in the county. He said there are four in the <br /> 13 northern portion and one in White Cross. He said that they area a half-mile radius around historic <br /> 14 areas in the community with access to transportation. <br /> 15 Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked what would replace them if they are eliminated. <br /> 16 Leigh Anne King said usually they revert to whatever is currently surrounding the node. <br /> 17 Cy Stober said it would likely rural and agricultural residential. He said that there are also <br /> 18 rural neighborhood activity nodes. <br /> 19 Tom Altieri said there are about 10 of them. <br /> 20 Cy Stober said that in these scenarios, they are pressing hard on levers to show different <br /> 21 scenarios. He said that they will likely end up somewhere in between but this is a demonstration <br /> 22 to prove a point. He said they are focused primarily on housing and jobs density and locations <br /> 23 they would be fated to be over the next 20 years. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Slide #36 <br /> PROM.W. -.M. IN <br /> - Focus on creating conservation subdivisions that <br /> could include a mix of housing types and possibly <br /> neighborhood serving commercial areas <br /> - Protect key ecologically valuable areas of site <br /> Will likely require municipal utility services or <br /> community systems to serve development <br /> - Identify locations within County'sjurisdiction <br /> �■ proximate to municipalities and outside of WSW <br /> critical areas <br /> - Potential testing of locations in Rural Buffer <br /> 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.