Orange County NC Website
26 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 636 Adam Beeman: Go ahead, you have a question? <br /> 637 <br /> 638 Delores Bailey: I believe that people should be able to sell and run a business they way they need to. 1 <br /> 639 thought it was restrictive at first. I think this is really restrictive. I'm not of the opinion that we should not allow <br /> 640 it, so I just want that stated clearly. <br /> 641 <br /> 642 Adam Beeman: Are you of the opinion to leave it as the amendment is written whereas just as Conditional <br /> 643 District? <br /> 644 <br /> 645 Delores Bailey: Yes. <br /> 646 <br /> 647 Adam Beeman: So, you don't necessarily agree stuffing it into an 11, 12, 13? <br /> 648 <br /> 649 Delores Bailey: Not necessarily. <br /> 650 <br /> 651 Adam Beeman: Okay. <br /> 652 <br /> 653 Chris Johnston: And I want to say, I've got my motion out, it's got a second, I think we're at the point where <br /> 654 we throw down just to,just to see what to do. <br /> 655 <br /> 656 Adam Beeman: You guys are all clear on what he's proposing? <br /> 657 <br /> 658 Steve Kaufman: He's proposing that we're not going to have any stores like that in Orange County. <br /> 659 <br /> 660 IN FAVOR: Marilyn Carter, Lamar Proctor, Charity Kirk. <br /> 661 OPPOSED:Adam Beeman, Delores Bailey, Beth Bronson, Statler Gilfillen, Chris Johnston, Steve Kaufmann, Liz <br /> 662 Kalies, Whitney Watson. <br /> 663 MOTION NOT PASSED 3 TO 8. <br /> 664 <br /> 665 MOTION BY Marilyn Carter to pass the proposed change as written. Seconded by Delores Bailey. <br /> 666 <br /> 667 Chris Johnston: In the Conditional Zoning District? <br /> 668 <br /> 669 Marilyn Carter: Yes. <br /> 670 <br /> 671 IN FAVOR:Adam Beeman, Delores Bailey, Marilyn Carter, Statler Gilfillen, Steve Kaufmann, Liz Kalies, Lamar <br /> 672 Proctor, Whitney Watson. <br /> 673 OPPOSED: Chris Johnston, Charity Kirk, Beth Bronson. <br /> 674 MOTION PASSED 8 TO 3. <br /> 675 <br /> 676 Cy Stober: This will be presented to the Commissioner's at the June 4th public hearing. <br /> 677 <br /> 678 MOTION BY Beth Bronson that the Proposed Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment has a <br /> 679 Statement of Approval and Consistency per Attachment 1 that the meets all of the requirements of LIDO <br /> 680 Section 2.8. <br /> 681 Seconded by Lamar Proctor. <br /> 682 <br /> 683 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> 684 <br />