Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
63 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 201 <br /> 202 Beth Bronson: Thank you very much, I appreciate that. <br /> 203 <br /> 204 Cy Stober: Section 5.18, on Page 113 of Article 5. <br /> 205 <br /> 206 Taylor Perschau: I would just offer that I have a few more slides to get through process wise, which we can <br /> 207 continue discussion now, or if I get through the slides, then it can be a totally open floor. <br /> 208 <br /> 209 Adam Beeman: It's up to you. <br /> 210 <br /> 211 Taylor Perschau: Okay. I did want to go ahead and acknowledge that we met requirements for public <br /> 212 notification as detailed in the UDO, so notices for this meeting were mailed via First Class Mail to all property <br /> 213 owners within 1,000 feet of the subject parcels on April 19th. Signs were posted on the subject properties April <br /> 214 18th, and ever since we've had application materials ready, we have had them posted publicly on our Active <br /> 215 Development Webpage. Staff analysis is that the application is complete in accordance with Section 2.8 of the <br /> 216 LIDO. We also find that the proposal is consistent with goals and objectives outlined within the Orange County <br /> 217 Comprehensive Plan,as was referenced. The Matrix where we're looking at the Future Land Use Classifications <br /> 218 against the zoning does find that GC4 is compatible with the Commercial Industrial Transition in a way that Rural <br /> 219 Residential is actually not. So,the amendment is also found to be reasonable and in the public interest because <br /> 220 it furthers goals of the adopted Comprehensive Plan and is located in an area designated on the Future Land <br /> 221 Use Map as Commercial Industrial Transition Activity Node. Such areas have been identified as areas changing <br /> 222 from rural to urban in form and density, allowing a full range of commercial and industrial uses. So, now that <br /> 223 you've heard from myself and the applicant, now would be time for more review and discussion. I'm available, <br /> 224 Jana and Anthony are available, so back to you. <br /> 225 <br /> 226 Whitney Watson: I know you would like to have a drive through ATM there, and I think the reasons make a lot <br /> 227 of sense. I was curious about what other ATMs are already in the area? I think there's one at Missy's Grill. Is <br /> 228 there any other? <br /> 229 <br /> 230 Anthony Cecil: The only two that we know of are business owned at Missy's Grill, and the other one is at <br /> 231 Efland Supermarket. The closest State Employees would be Churton Grove, and then the next one would be <br /> 232 downtown Mebane near Junction. <br /> 233 <br /> 234 Whitney Watson: Right. Since I know that ATMs can drive business, so customers come there, they get their <br /> 235 cash, then they go in and spend it. What are the business owners of these two other ATMs. Have they had any <br /> 236 comments about the installation of additional ATM in that area? <br /> 237 <br /> 238 Anthony Cecil: I haven't talked to the owner of Missy's. I do know him personally, but I have spoken, not <br /> 239 directly about this subject, with Randy, and I know at Efland Supermarket. I know, the Credit Union had been in <br /> 240 touch with him at one point in time, but I think due to rental or lease agreements, I don't think it ever went through. <br /> 241 <br /> 242 Adam Beeman: All right, thank you. Steve? <br /> 243 <br /> 244 Steve Kaufman: I have no questions. <br /> 245 <br /> 246 Delores Bailey: I do have a question. Back to the ATM, does it cost you all to have the ATM positioned <br /> 247 there? <br /> 248 <br /> 249 Anthony Cecil: No,we do have a lease agreement where I think they were paying us something, $300.00 a <br /> 250 month— <br />