Browse
Search
Climate Council Meeting Summary - 6-16-21
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Climate Council
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
Climate Council Meeting Summary - 6-16-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2024 10:34:39 AM
Creation date
5/23/2024 10:34:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/16/2021
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Trueblood reinforced the idea that the overall workplan should be set by the <br />Council overall. <br /> <br />Slade offered that the County's Food Policy Council gets its directions from the work <br />groups and then get approved by the central council. <br /> <br />Trueblood clarified that she is proposing something similar. The ideas could come <br />from the Workgroups initially at the beginning of the year and then be coordinated, <br />refined, and approved by the Council overall. This way all the priorities are <br />coordinated. <br /> <br />Bouma then summarized that there seemed to be good agreement around <br />restructuring by audience and product. He also mentioned that having a <br />membership driven workplan would not exclude the Council’s ability to respond to <br />requests from any of our authorizing member governments. <br /> <br />Monast clarified that our assistance to local governments does not have to be in <br />response to an explicit request, but rather should come from the Council being <br />aware of where the jurisdictions are on climate action, what barriers and questions <br />they have, and what they would like to accomplish that they haven't been able to. <br />This may work better than starting with our own action ideas. Bouma agreed. <br /> <br />Smylie offered that OC Schools does not have an overarching climate plan and <br />limited staff capacity for additional work, and that what would be most useful from <br />the Council would be a sense of what the biggest opportunities are. <br /> <br />Slade offered that advisory boards and contractors might be a good source for these <br />kinds of ideas and one idea in particular to consider is performance contracting. <br /> <br />Smylie responded that they do not have an advisory board on climate. <br /> <br />Kaufman responded that the Climate Council might be able to offer some ideas to <br />OC Schools on things like building energy efficiency. <br /> <br />Bedford offered that there are school construction standards that speak to energy <br />efficiency, but they may not have been updated since 2009. It’s another idea that <br />could be impactful for this group to lend their expertise to. <br /> <br />Kuhn offered that the Working Groups may want to meet and discuss the details of <br />how they want to focus their work, based on this discussion. This could be brought <br />back to the next meeting. Trueblood and Tiger agreed. <br /> <br />Trueblood asked for a copy of the meeting recording to be shared with all the <br />members. Bouma said that he would send it out. <br /> <br />Bouma called back to Miller’s comment about the importance of private sector <br />involvement. Slade mentioned that regarding the business community is that Duke <br />Energy is a big funder of the Chamber of Commerce, and that may makes it more
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.