4_3_24 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

APPROVED WITH CORRECTIONS 5.1.24 298 Phil Koch: Yeah. There's nothing that we could do north of the stream because we simply can't access 299 it, but even on the southern part of the stream that Duke Power easement is going to act as our hard break from 300 going back there with any kind of lot, or any kind of structure. 301 302 Lamar Proctor: So, this plan, as it's presented, will be like the final development for this parcel. 303 304 Phil Koch: Yes. That's the intent of the Concept Plan is to give you. You're looking at probably about 305 90 percent of what this layout is going to end up being. The other 10 percent are little things that would have to 306 change just as we work through design. 307 308 Lamar Proctor: And the green spaces on each individual parcel, I assume that there's regulations within the 309 HOA that prohibit development of those or building of sheds or things. Like how does that all work? 310 311 Phil Koch: The green spaces that are shown there are representative of the septic areas that are in 312 there. 313 314 Lamar Proctor: So you can't do anything with it. 315 316 Phil Koch: Well,you don't want to do anything in there. You know, if a lot actually has more septic area 317 than is required for that lot, somebody could possibly put an accessory dwelling in there, but they would have to 318 still have septic space to accommodate that. I mean, that would be the only structures that I can think of, some 319 kind of an accessory dwelling or shed. 320 321 Statler Gilfillen: Did you individually do the septic check each in front of those? 322 323 Phil Koch: These septic soils were originally identified by Alan Clapp. He's pretty knowledgeable on 324 this. He's way more knowledgeable than I am, but we feel pretty comfortable that the space that's allotted for the 325 septic provides for three to five bedroom homes throughout that area. 326 327 Cy Stober: Mr. Chair, if I may, I just want to remind you of what this is tonight. So,to Mr. Proctor's point 328 on Stroud's Creek and the continued dialogue between the Department of Environment Agricultural Parks and 329 Recreation about the possible trails networks and so on, so, this is the Concept Plan. It's not the Preliminary 330 Plat. You can make a recommendation to the applicant. You can also make a recommendation to the Board of 331 Commissioners, external to the entire subdivision process on a possible partnership or a role for DEAPR to have 332 in either preserving and protecting or minimally developing that area for public access. So, that would be just 333 initiated by this Board. It would need a separate motion and so forth, but when this comes back as a Preliminary 334 Plat,just as a point of process, I would just offer you that guidance. There are things within the Major Subdivision 335 review process that you can interact with the applicant on, but there's also maybe a recommendation about a 336 significant resource that you may want to make a separate recommendation to the Board on, so just offering that 337 feedback. 338 339 Chris Johnston: Our purpose isn't to make suggestions to the applicant. It's more to approve or deny based on 340 UDO conformance and that sort of thing. We're not here to do the design. We can make suggestions, but in 341 terms of what we're here to do, it either fits or it doesn't. 342 Marilyn Carter: The UDO requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting which appears to have been well 343 attended, and so I'm interested to know at that meeting what was the primary feedback? What specific actions, 344 if any, were taken as a result of that feedback at that meeting? 345 346 Phil Koch: The majority of the design work in all honesty was pretty much in relation to comments from 347 the DAC. The biggest thing that came up again,well there were two things, stormwater,which always comes up