Browse
Search
AHAB Meeting Minutes (12192023)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Affordable Housing Advisory Board
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
AHAB Meeting Minutes (12192023)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2024 3:07:43 PM
Creation date
5/21/2024 3:07:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kyle: February outside agency presentations, and March outside agency scoring,that means that no <br /> decisions will be made until that time? <br /> Erica: Until the March meeting <br /> Kyle:There are applicants who had some deadlines with the towns that expire before that so thats <br /> something we probably need to communicate. <br /> Bonnie:The outside agency presentations are for fiscal year 2024-25 funding. Outside agencies <br /> applications are due January 15,the county reviews those and then we distribute them.Then in late <br /> March, I meet with every outside agency after you all have listened to and ranked them.They do not <br /> receive funding until July 1 of 2024 because I make a recommendation to the Board of Orange <br /> County Commissioners as to what their funding should be.That shouldn't change anything for <br /> outside agencies because they don't usually know what their funding is until May 2nd,when I <br /> present the recommended budget to the board. <br /> Kyle: Wasn't there some 2023 money also involved? <br /> Bonnie:That's what we're talking about tonight.This is the RFP for affordable housing money. $5 <br /> million was for CIP and then there was$700,000 that was heldover from the bond.That's why we <br /> have $5.7 million tonight.That is separate of the outside agencies. Our hope is that what we <br /> complete tonight we will be able to take to the board on January 16 for approval. <br /> Holly: I had a question. When I was doing the scoring, I saw in the column, a smaller number, and <br /> when I did the scoring there was a higher number. I dont understand why that was. <br /> Erica: Thomas went through and made sure that the scoring was consistent. <br /> Holly: Okay, thanks. <br /> IV. Score RFP Applications(75 minutes) <br /> Erica: So what staff have done is we've gone through every application, and we're just showing the <br /> average awards for each one. <br /> Lynn: I had a question about how the local and residency was tabulated, because I weighted them. <br /> Did everybody else do it that way? <br /> Hasan: I had a similar question, if you're talking about the AMI categories, I struggled on how to <br /> weight them based on the different AMI categories the application was requesting. In addition I <br /> think that quantity matters and in the scoring I think that nuance was missed. <br /> Lynn: So that we're consistent, how did everybody calculate that? <br /> Erica: Also,Thomas updated some of the scores. Did you want to talk about that? <br /> Thomas:There were some scores that did not reflect the scorecard accurately so scores that went <br /> over the highest possible score on the scorecard, I just applied the highest possible score.That's <br /> essentially all that I changed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.