Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-13-2004-5n
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 04-13-2004
>
Agenda - 04-13-2004-5n
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:39:10 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:40:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/13/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5n
Document Relationships
2004 S Purchasing -Geographic Technologies Group Inc RFP Award Address Geocoding From Field Verification
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2000's\2004
Minutes - 20040413
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br />thereby increasing the reliability of dispatch information significantly. This is accomplished by <br />actually visiting each address and visually verifying that the existing structures match the <br />database information, A complete scope of work is listed below. <br />Orange County Purchasing, EMS, Land Records, and Planning, as well as representatives from <br />the Town of Hillsborough, Town of Chapel Hill, and Town of Carrbora developed a <br />comprehensive request for proposals (RFP) that would not only provide a product that would <br />benefit law enforcement, emergency personnel as well as other County and Town departments, <br />but would also ensure mechanisms would be in place to continue correctly assigning and <br />maintaining addresses. The scope of work proposed included: <br />1. Address database updating, editing, formatting, verification and completion to stated <br />project standards and specifications (National Emergency Numbering Association <br />(NENA) specifications for Geographic Information System (GIS) database design <br />standards for road centerlines, structure addresses, and address ranges; <br />2. Development and implementation of a plan to field verify existing addresses of all <br />addressed structures (of particular note, to include individual addresses within multi- <br />family structures and the Global Positioning System (GPS) identification of structures on <br />large rural properties and driveway entrances); <br />3. Formatting and processing of final address data to meet current and anticipated <br />Computer Aided Dispatch and GIS applications and requirements within the County <br />(including Phase II Wireless requirements for mapping and call location); <br />4. Development of GIS data of all addressed structures at their correct geographic location <br />with parsed individual addresses attached as attributes that are formatted such that <br />address database matching can be achieved with 98% match of structure addresses that <br />fall within the street centerline range and call-in location display; <br />5. Develop and provide reports of areas within the County far which existing addressing is <br />confused or conflicting to the point that the County should consider re-addressing to a <br />more consistent standard. Reports shall include specific recommendations far correcting <br />problem areas; and <br />6. Orange County requires that the Consultant deliver final address and GIS data that <br />provides the County Emergency Operations Center the ability to locate (using existing <br />Computer Aided Dispatch software) addressed structures to individual specific structure <br />location as well as by interpolation from address ranges. Orange County will utilize the <br />data from this project to implement reliable and accurate Computer Aided Dispatch (from <br />both landline and wireless calls) by both individual geacoded structure location and <br />address range capability. <br />The RFP was advertised and forwarded to twenty-one vendors. Six firms subsequently <br />submitted proposals. Seven criteria upon which each proposal would be evaluated were stated <br />in the RFP: <br />1. Demonstrated understanding of the problems and needs presented by the project - (5%); <br />2. Qualifications of project personnel and Respondent's ability to commit capable staff to <br />support a project of this size - (10%); <br />3. Quality and applicability of software and equipment to be used - (5%); <br />4. Ability to complete the project in a timely manner without major deviations from <br />necessary requirements - (10%); <br />5. Past experience with similar projects by proposed staff, specifically E-911 addressing <br />experience, experience with NENA Specifications, and field verification of addresses for <br />CAD and GIS applications - (20%); <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.