Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-09-2005-5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 11-09-2005
>
Agenda - 11-09-2005-5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 12:52:15 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:40:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/9/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20051109
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
representative, in this case, the Secretary of Transportation) after the required conformity <br />determinations are made; however, the State and MPO can mutually agree to a subset of the 2006- <br />2012 STIP and MTIP projects that is consistent with both documents as long as the transportation <br />conformity consequences do not jeopardize the conformity determination. Projects shown in the <br />2006-2012 MTIP beyond the first three years (2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012) are considered only for <br />planning purposes, and do not have to be consistent with the STIP in order for the MTIP to be <br />approved, The MTIP is not adopted until approved by the MPO and the Governor. <br />Attachment 2 lists differences between the 2006-2012 STIP and MTIP that staff from DCHC MPO <br />Lead Planning Agency (LPA) and local jurisdiction members discussed with the NCDOT at a <br />meeting held on October 4~h, The chart shows that most of those differences have been resolved. <br />A check mark beside a "pending" status in the "Issues" column indicates items that were resolved <br />by the amendments in Attachment 1, <br />The Secretary of Transportation must approve the DCHC MPO 2006-2012 MTIP. The State must <br />then make a conformity determination for the MTIP. <br />Some of the resolved items may require amendments to the 2006-2012 STIP, The NC Board of <br />Transportation will address those changes once the MTIP has been approved, <br />2007-2013 Transportation Improvement Program <br />The DCHC MPO TAC will consider approving a Regional Priority List far the 2007-2013 TIP on <br />November 9, 2005. The Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC), at its meeting on October 26, <br />2005, reviewed changes to the priority list that were based on the direction of the TAC at its <br />meeting in October. Attachment 2 is a copy of the Division 7 priority list recommended by the TCC <br />to the TAG to consider in adopting a regional priority. The chart indicates haw each project ranked <br />according to local jurisdiction priorities and according to its score of criteria points. <br />The following lists Orange County's priorities ranked by local priorities and ranked by criteria points: <br /> <br />Orange County Priority Rank by <br />Local Priority Rank by <br />Criteria <br />Points <br />1. Oran e Grove Road edestrian brid e over I-40 1 7 <br />2. Homestead Road im rovements 7 15 <br />3. Im rovements to South Churton Street 5 18 <br />4. Old NC 86 bic cle lanes 16 42 <br />5. NC 86 bic cle lanes 17 36 <br />6. NC 86 Im rovements north of Hillsborou h 20 48 <br />7. US 70 B ass Widenin 12 43 <br />8. Eno Mountain Rd,/Mayo St./Orange Grove Rd, <br />intersection reali nment <br />18 <br />43 <br />9. Oran e Grove Rd. extension to US 70 Business 29 46 <br />The TCC noted that, in many instances, the rank a project obtains through the MPO's endorsed <br />methodology for ranking projects based on certain criteria does not reflect the local jurisdictions <br />priorities, The methodology is a work in progress that is constantly being refined to better reflect <br />the MPO criteria standards, The TCC suggests, that far the next TIP update, that local jurisdictions <br />submit a list of projects that may be included in the local priority lists to the TCC to be ranked using <br />the MPO approved criteria prior to local jurisdictions adopting priority lists.. The results would then <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.