Orange County NC Website
255 <br /> REQUIREMENT UDO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE Staff BOA <br /> SPECIFIC STANDARDS <br /> In accordance with Sections 2.7.7 & 5.3.2(A)(2), the Board of Adjustment shall also consider the following <br /> general conditions before the application for a Special Use can be approved. <br /> Application package as As documented <br /> contained in Attachment 2 in the Staff <br /> inclusive including, but not Report <br /> limited to: (Attachment 1), <br /> • Narrative; the staff finds <br /> Site Plan; that the use will <br /> • Proposed Conditions; maintain or <br /> promote the <br /> • Environmental <br /> Assessment (EA) public health, <br /> Application; safety, and <br /> The use (will /will not) maintain general <br /> or promote the public health, safety • Site Plan; and <br /> p 0 Zoning Report welfare, if <br /> and general welfare, if located Section 5.3.2 located where <br /> where proposed and developed (A)(2)(a) Staff review comments proposed and <br /> and operated according to the plan (Attachment 5) developed and <br /> as submitted. operated <br /> Based on all above findings, according to <br /> Applicant's Narrative, and the plan as <br /> Staffs report, the Board finds submitted <br /> the use will/will not maintain <br /> or promote the public health, <br /> safety, and general welfare if <br /> located where proposed and <br /> developed and operated <br /> according to the plan as <br /> submitted. <br /> Staff Report (Attachment 1); <br /> Application package <br /> (Attachment 2); Based on the <br /> The use (will /will not) maintain Staff review comments materials <br /> or enhance the value of contiguous (Attachment 5); and provided, the <br /> property (unless the use is a public Section 5.3.2 staff finds no <br /> necessity, in which case the use (A)(2)(b) Evidence submitted by potential injury <br /> need not maintain or enhance the applicant to the value of <br /> value of contiguous property). contiguous <br /> Based on all above findings, property <br /> and a lack of <br /> competent/material evidence in <br /> the record refuting the <br /> testimony, the Board finds the <br />