12.13.23 BOA Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6 1 Lawrence Road and all adjoining residential properties. These are 30-foot buffers, as I mentioned before,to preserve the 2 existing wooded vegetation and to be supplemented by a Type C buffer where that screening is insufficient. 40-foot buffers 3 will be provided everywhere else that is not included in the previous section that can be found in UDO Section 5.2.2. For 4 parking which is regulated in Section 6.9.7,we provide ten spaces per athletic field with additional parking for overflow and 5 to get vehicles off of streets. We've also submitted a lighting plan which is regulated in Section 6.11.7(A)which ensures 6 that all outdoor areas and parking lot lighting fixtures, other than floodlights and flood lamps used within the facility shall be 7 cut off fixtures, all mounting heights for outdoor lighting except for the field lighting,will not exceed 36 feet above the 8 finished grade, and any light fixtures placed in such a manner that no lamp surface is visible from any residential area, 9 public or private street. Furthermore, as per LIDO Section 6.11.7(C), because this project is located in an urbanizing area 10 of the county, the hours of operation for the lighting system for any game or event shall be no later than 11:00 p.m. except 11 to conclude a scheduled event that was in progress before 11:00 p.m. and circumstances prevented it ending before that 12 time. And all of that lighting will meet the requirements of the lighting section. For signs, Section 6.12.13(G)(3),there shall 13 be one freestanding identification sign for each property. It will be 20 square feet in total sign area. The sign will either be 14 ground or pole mounted. It will be set back 10 feet from any property line. The illuminations will follow the LIDO regulations 15 and all signs will conform to the additional requirements in the sign section. Private streets, particularly related to the 16 stream crossing. Stream crossing is also in a 65-foot buffer, per Orange County's regulations. This is to preserve the 17 natural wooded around there to reduce runoff and protect against erosion and to help maintain the integrity of the stream 18 that will convey the stormwater runoff from the site. The streets conform with Section 6.13.6(C)(4) by ensuring that they 19 cross the stream at a right angle or as close to it as possible. In my professional opinion, I believe the plan conforms with all 20 of the special requirements applicable to this use, special use requirements in LIDO Section 5.3.2(A), specific Special Use 21 Requirements in UDO Section 5.3.2(B), as well as the specific requirements for recreational facilities in 5.7.2. And it is also 22 my professional opinion that the site is designed as per the development standards of Article 6 of the Orange County UDO 23 and if there are no questions at this time, I will bring up Mr. Lyle Overcash. 24 25 Leon Meyers: Board members, questions for Mr.Wirt?Will there be any further detail presentation on lighting on the site 26 later in your presentation? 27 28 Will Wirt: There's none planned, but there could be if you need it. 29 30 Patrick Byker: There is a detailed lighting study in the staff report I believe. We're happy to go over that detail, but it's in 31 your package from the staff.And that gives the footcandle readings across the 53-acres. Happy to go into that in detail 32 during question and answer. 33 34 Leon Meyers: My question, I may have misunderstood the LIDO standard, in the field lighting presentation in particular it's 35 page 473 in the agenda package. I believe it shows the lighting levels in footcandles at the property boundary. And I see 36 some lighting levels at 2.5 and down from there. Does that meet the LIDO standard for lighting? 37 38 Patrick Byker: No,we would have to revise that. My understanding, Chairman Meyers, is that in order to get a certificate of 39 occupancy for any of these facilities we're looking at tonight,we turned in the lighting standard. After it's actually built, our 40 team will have to have a site visit with the Orange County Planning and Inspections team and monitor all those footcandle 41 readings on the perimeter of the building. And then we can't get a CO unless they meet the LIDO standard. So we've 42 turned in that lighting study, but what really will matter is the field verification that's done after it's built. And then,of course, 43 there is adjustments made to the lights, the heights, and the directions to make sure that the footcandle reading at the 44 perimeter is consistent with UDO regulation otherwise we can't get a certificate of occupancy. 45 46 Leon Meyers: I understand. Would you be willing to add a condition on the site plan approval that the lighting levels shown 47 on that field study will be revised. 48 49 Patrick Byker: Of course. 50 51 Taylor Perschau: Chairman Meyers if I may? I can further speak to, so Page 473,you are correct that the,for urbanized 52 areas footcandle can be no greater than 0.5 when adjacent to residential. The note at the bottom right is what staff used to 53 determine conformance that the lighting plan, so the Applicant indicated that shielding was going to be utilized as well as 54 the landscape buffer neither of which were accounted for,to my understanding, in the lighting plan. 55