12.13.23 BOA Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

25 1 this property boundary not necessarily on their property boundary, it would be even less. So the effect of this level 2 providing water to this project are going to be minimal on any adjacent properties. And so given that plus the low and 3 intermittent demand to be placed on these wells, they're not going to be pumping 24/7,when the site's being used, it's my 4 professional expert opinion that there's no significant adverse impact on any existing wells in the area. And further, it's my 5 professional opinion that the well locations and their proposed operation to supply the facility will protect groundwater 6 resources in the area. I'd be glad to answer any questions. 7 8 Leon Meyers: Questions for Mr. Lappala?Thank you, sir. 9 10 Beth Bronson: I have a question. Sorry, Mr. Lappala, so you are here representing as a consultant and you did a review of 11 Summit's? Did you, and you,you performed a review of Summit's stormwater impact analysis? 12 13 Eric Lappala: No. I did my own. I did my own independent analysis of the groundwater conditions and the amount of water 14 that would be required to provide this facility. There are two hypothetical well locations on the site plan. It's my 15 understanding those are hypothetical because that may change. But based upon those two locations, I did my assessment 16 basically assuming that that's where they would be. 17 18 Beth Bronson:And neither of them were located within Lot A,that is correct? Neither of those well locations are located 19 within Lot A? The lot that's not being considered? 20 21 Eric Lappala: No. 22 23 Beth Bronson: Both of those well locations are. 24 25 Eric Lappala: Correct. One is up in the corner of the parking lot for the tennis courts and pickleball courts and the other was 26 down in the corner around the ball fields. 27 28 Beth Bronson: Okay.And the subjects kind of split off. And it's broken up into like three different fields,correct? 29 30 Eric Lappala: Yes. But that well would supply all the ball fields,that's my understanding. Now,that's a design,that's 31 whoever's doing the hydrologic design for the projects they're going to have to figure out the most efficient way to deliver 32 water with whatever wells they have out there. 33 34 Beth Bronson:And would that change that 10 gallons per parking space if there were facilities such as showers or a 35 sauna? 36 37 Eric Lappala: No. The 10 gallons per parking space is what the Department of Health and Human Services says for these 38 kind of facilities,that's the way you account for it. If it's a house, it's either right now it's 74 gallons per bedroom per day, 39 assuming three bedrooms per day,that's how you do that calculation. They have for different uses, restaurants and 40 facilities and so forth,they have different guidelines to how you have to size your septic system and your sewer system. 41 And so since we provide the water to those, we use that to figure out how much water they're going to have to pump. 42 43 Beth Bronson: Certainly. I'm thinking of just these types of facilities are just a sink and a bathroom. Usually just restrooms. 44 But if there were to be a full shower, sauna or some and the sprinkler system. 45 46 Eric Lappala: It's my understanding that that 10 gallons per parking space per day accounts for that. 47 48 Beth Bronson: It counts for all of that? 49 50 Eric Lappala: Yes.Any more questions? Thank you for your time. 51 52 Jeff Scott: Can I ask one more question. I did want to ask a question, since you're the expert with wells and what not with 53 that, based on the size of this development, and I'm assuming that the surrounding residential properties all rely on well 54 service for their residential use. And again, you can correct me if I'm wrong, but is there any impact to the underlying 55 aquifer,you know,within that area based on the size and the intensity of this property to surrounding properties?