Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
10 <br /> 1 Beth Bronson:A loop off of Lawrence? <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Laura Coronado: So you enter, yes,you enter the Washington. And you go out on Jefferson or vice versa. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Beth Bronson: Okay. And it's a loop. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Laura Coronado: Yes,the main thing is when you are going to your right side it is okay because it's your right. But if you <br /> 8 are going to try to your left and someone because they propose the entrance would be on Lawrence, so that will be a mess. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Beth Bronson: If I'm looking at the site plans correctly, the entrance would be after Washington Drive and before Jefferson <br /> 11 Drive. The entrance to this parcel would be in-between the only two entrances and exits to your neighborhood; is that <br /> 12 correct? <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Laura Coronado:Yes, it is correct. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Beth Bronson: Okay. Then I will make a motion that this citizen has standing in this public hearing based on point Number <br /> 17 2. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Adam Beeman: She has to meet Paragraph 2 under Point Number 2. Bottom of that last sentence in Paragraph 2.The <br /> 20 parties secondary impact providing documentation of the same. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Beth Bronson:Yes, documentation will be that she's a homeowner in this case, right? She's a homeowner where the main <br /> 23 entrance to this parcel that's under consideration is in the middle of the only two entrances to a neighborhood of, I would <br /> 24 say, more than 40 homes. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Adam Beeman: Does she have documentation? <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Beth Bronson:And again, she's stating that she's a homeowner. She did not bring her information with her to prove that. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Adam Beeman: I mean, I'm just following the rules that's the way I see it. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Beth Bronson: Okay. I'm making the motion that this person has standing. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Leon Meyers: Okay. And that's the same motion that you made a few minutes ago. Is there a second for that motion? <br /> 35 Motion dies for lack of a second. Is there any further motion regarding Ms. Coronado's standing? <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Beth Bronson: I will just comment that we have allowed standing on the basis of vicinity and perceived impact without an <br /> 38 expert opinion before. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Nathan Robinson: I make a motion based on the second paragraph there. It says"individual asserting standing are <br /> 41 required to do more than simply state that they live in the vicinity of the subject property." With respect and I don't know the <br /> 42 details there because I don't live there. But it appears to me that my motion is based on the fact that the only thing you <br /> 43 brought before us today is you simply stated that you live there. That you don't bring the materials or substantiation <br /> 44 necessary to establish standing tonight. So that's my motion. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 Leon Meyers:That was a motion to deny standing, is that right? <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Nathan Robinson: Correct. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 Adam Beeman: I second that motion. <br /> 51 <br /> 52 Beth Bronson: I would just make the comment that she is not simply stating that it will harm her property value. She is here <br /> 53 to state her information about the traffic and her damages would be the traffic not her home value. I don't see that sentence <br /> 54 applying, and I apologize if we see differently on that. <br /> 55 <br />