Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-09-2005-2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 11-09-2005
>
Agenda - 11-09-2005-2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 12:52:43 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:40:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/9/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20051109
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br />benefits. Staff strongly recommends further explm•ing this concept, including working with <br />the County Attorney to identify equity options beneficial to both parties. <br />General Transportation Issues <br />The actual waste tr°ansfer process has tlu•ee components -transfer station operation, hauling, and <br />disposal. The transfer station operation costs are virtually the same regardless of where the waste is <br />going. The costs of the other two components are variable depending on hauling distance and <br />tipping fees at the distant disposal facility. <br />The cost of transporting waste from an Orange County transfer station to an out-of-county landfill <br />will be incurred whether the distant landfill is in Alamance County or a more distant disposal <br />facility, While the cost per mile will be similar for hauling regardless of the destination, obviously <br />total transportation costs will be greater relative to the distance traveled. The disposal cost will also <br />vary depending on the tipping fee rate at the distant landfill. <br />Of course there are other transportation-related issues. One is the wear and tear of roads whereby <br />flee assumption is that the longer the haul, the more impact on roads, Additionally, there is the <br />vehicle emissions issue.. The longer the haul, the more emissions will be discharged. While these <br />are also real costs, these costs do not directly impact the Solid Waste budget unless a preference is <br />made to deliver to a closer disposal facility that may have a higher tipping fee, resulting in a greater <br />overall budgetary cost. <br />Conclusions <br />From our examination of'the issues surrounding Alamance County's inquiry regarding whether <br />Orange County would be interested in transfering waste to the Alamance County landfill, I have <br />made the following observations: <br />• Significant additional costs will be incurred whenever Orange County begins to transfer waste. <br />This fact was identified in the department's 10-year Financial Plan. <br />• hr order to transfer waste to any out-oF-county disposal facility, development of a transfer <br />station in Orange County will be required. <br />• A combination ofhauling azid disposal costs will likelybe utilized to determine the overall <br />financial impact of waste transfer options, given that decisions of this nature are typically based <br />on lowest cost. <br />• Development of a Temporary transfer station would add substantial additional costs to any <br />decision to begin transferring waste at the earliest opportunity. <br />• Development of a transfer station in Chapel Hill's planning jurisdiction would offer limited <br />opporttmity to "fast track" permitting and construction of such a facility. <br />• It is unlikely that an out-of county disposal facility closer than the Alamance Cotmty Landfill <br />will be identified. <br />• It is likely that mm~erous out-of=county waste disposal options are available that offer lower <br />disposal tipping fees than Alamance County's $.36/ton fee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.