Browse
Search
Agenda 05-07-24; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
Agenda - 05-07-2024 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 05-07-24; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2024 1:50:40 PM
Creation date
5/2/2024 1:39:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/7/2024
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for May 7, 2024 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2024\Agenda - 05-07-2024 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
43 <br /> 1 said that this use is in line with supporting the Rural Buffer. She said this keeps a local business <br /> 2 local and out of people's backyards. She said she thinks it is an appropriate use. <br /> 3 Commissioner Fowler said this was not changing the Rural Buffer and it is an appropriate <br /> 4 use. She said that she had been concerned about the access road, but they came to an <br /> 5 agreement with the county for what happens afterwards. She said she was in favor of the <br /> 6 application. <br /> 7 Commissioner Richards said it does not say they cannot develop in the Rural Buffer and <br /> 8 that there are very specific things that can be done in the Rural Buffer. She said this does not <br /> 9 change the boundaries, and the amendment is clear of what can and cannot be done. <br /> 10 Commissioner McKee said this type of application from a small business is something that <br /> 11 the Board has been open about supporting. He said it does not change the Rural Buffer. He said <br /> 12 the Rural Buffer was not unanimously popular with the farming community. He said that this does <br /> 13 not infringe on property rights. He said this came out of the Planning Board with unanimous <br /> 14 support. He said the chippers that are used in grinding operations are the size of tractor and <br /> 15 trailer trucks. He said that is not what will be here. He said the applicant will be collecting, <br /> 16 combining, and shipping out. He said they should be open to operations that align with the intent <br /> 17 of the Rural Buffer. <br /> 18 Commissioner Hamilton said she is familiar with the Treeist company's work. She said <br /> 19 that she agrees with her colleagues, and it aligns with the intent of the Rural Buffer. She said she <br /> 20 is not concerned that they will end up with fast food in this area. She said that one of the unique <br /> 21 things about Orange County are all of the trees and supporting them is vital. <br /> 22 Commissioner Portie-Ascott said she was supportive of the proposal. She said she was <br /> 23 happy to hear that it would not create noise issues for neighbors. She said she is happy about <br /> 24 the jobs the business is providing to the community. She said that she is happy that it is consistent <br /> 25 with the intentions of the Rural Buffer. <br /> 26 Chair Bedford said they did receive comments from the Town of Chapel Hill. She said she <br /> 27 is happy if they do their recreational training on their property and not the county's. She said the <br /> 28 Town of Carrboro did not reply and there is no further need to consult with another entity at this <br /> 29 point. She said she listened to the link with the noise test and there could not be a better location <br /> 30 for this operation. She said that if the water is not drinkable, bottled can be done for the personnel. <br /> 31 She said that is manageable. She said it should not be a problem to do septic on site. She said <br /> 32 she was pleased to put the 10 acres to good quality work. <br /> 33 Vice-Chair Greene said one part of confusion is that they are changing the zoning from <br /> 34 Rural Buffer to something else. She said that the Planning Director explained that there is the <br /> 35 Rural Buffer, then there is the Rural Buffer Zone. She said that the zone will be changed but the <br /> 36 Rural Buffer itself stays unchanged and intact. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 A motion was made by Vice-Chair Greene, seconded by Commissioner McKee, to <br /> 39 approve the Statement of Consistency and Zoning Atlas Amendments. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 42 <br /> 43 6. Regular Agenda <br /> 44 None. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 7. Reports <br /> 47 None. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.