Orange County NC Website
this is where they want the entrance to be. It is near where the church entrance is, and they did not want these 547 <br />lots coming out on to the roadway north. They did not want it to tie to the one for the ball field. 548 <br /> 549 <br />Statler Gilfillen: What's their logic for that? 550 <br /> 551 <br />Phil Koch: They wanted to go ahead and bring out to Lawrence Road. 552 <br /> 553 <br />Adam Beeman: Do you know if the road for the athletic fields, is that a private road or public? I believe it's 554 <br />private, but I'm not positive. 555 <br /> 556 <br />Cy Stober: It's a Type A private road. The subdivision road will be publicly dedicated and maintained 557 <br />by North Carolina DOT. 558 <br /> 559 <br />Adam Beeman: So you can't have a public tied to a private. 560 <br /> 561 <br />Phil Koch: And I will add that for the number of lots that are here, this must be a public road. 562 <br /> 563 <br />Marilyn Carter: I have a question about the DAC comments. One of the comments refers to the lot sizes 564 <br />and concept wastewater disposal areas prohibit the department's siting private wells on each lot, according to 565 <br />the setback requirements of Orange County, and then a community well may be a solution, otherwise permitting 566 <br />is subject to denial. Where's the impact of that item in the DAC report on the plan? 567 <br /> 568 <br />Phil Koch: That comment was made at the original DAC. These locations, as they're currently shown, 569 <br />actually address that comment and were sent back and have been reviewed, and they do meet the standards 570 <br />now. 571 <br /> 572 <br />Delores Bailey: What size will the houses be? 573 <br /> 574 <br />Phil Koch: I don't know the exact size of the house. The way that we set this up, I believe, I think it's a 575 <br />7,500 square foot block. That's not the house size. That's just the pad. So it was a proportion of that pad. I can't 576 <br />tell you the exact size of the house. And, again, part of that will be defined also by the septic field. 577 <br /> 578 <br />MOTION BY Lamar Proctor to approve the Concept Plan Flexible Development Option as included in Attachment 579 <br />1. Seconded by Marilyn Carter. Adam Beeman, Lamar Proctor, Delores Bailey, Beth Bronson, Marilyn Carter, 580 <br />Chris Johnston, Steve Kaufmann, and Whitney Watson in favor. Statler Gilfillen against. 581 <br /> 582 <br />MOTION PASSED EIGHT TO ONE. 583 <br /> 584 <br />Ashley Moncado: The Preliminary Plat is in Attachment 2 of your materials. 585 <br /> 586 <br />Beth Bronson: The proposed stormwater control measures are just five different areas of where that would 587 <br />be added to? Can you elaborate on what management plan you have – 588 <br /> 589 <br />Phil Koch: Those are, again, those are State mandated. Location is based on the actual contours on 590 <br />the site. We’ve placed these in the low area so that we can direct water to them. The actual sizing will be done 591 <br />based on State requirements. The County has its own requirements. They generally match the State’s for the 592 <br />most part, but we work with them pretty heavily on these things. So, they do have to meet that before they'll get 593 <br />approval. 594 <br /> 595 <br />19