Browse
Search
5-1-24 PB Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
5-1-24 PB Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2024 7:51:28 PM
Creation date
4/25/2024 7:49:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
5_1_24 Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Phil Koch: Yeah. There's nothing that we could do north of the stream because we simply can't access 298 <br />it, but even on the southern part of the stream that Duke Power easement is going to act as our hard break from 299 <br />going back there with any kind of lot, or any kind of structure. 300 <br /> 301 <br />Lamar Proctor: So, this plan, as it's presented, will be like the final development for this parcel. 302 <br /> 303 <br />Phil Koch: Yes. That's the intent of the Concept Plan is to give you. You’re looking at probably about 304 <br />90 percent of what this layout is going to end up being. The other 10 percent are little things that would have to 305 <br />change just as we work through design. 306 <br /> 307 <br />Lamar Proctor: And the green spaces on each individual parcel, I assume that there's regulations within the 308 <br />HOA that prohibit development of those or building of sheds or things. Like how does that all work? 309 <br /> 310 <br />Phil Koch: The green spaces that are shown there are representative of the septic areas that are in 311 <br />there. 312 <br /> 313 <br />Lamar Proctor: So you can't do anything with it. 314 <br /> 315 <br />Phil Koch: Well, you don't want to do anything in there. You know, if a lot actually has more septic area 316 <br />than is required for that lot, somebody could possibly put an accessory dwelling in there, but they would have to 317 <br />still have septic space to accommodate that. I mean, that would be the only structures that I can think of, some 318 <br />kind of an accessory dwelling or shed. 319 <br /> 320 <br />Statler Gilfillen: Did you individually do the septic check each in front of those? 321 <br /> 322 <br />Phil Koch: These septic soils were originally identified by Alan Clapp. He’s pretty knowledgeable on 323 <br />this. He's way more knowledgeable than I am, but we feel pretty comfortable that the space that's allotted for the 324 <br />septic provides for three to five bedroom homes throughout that area. 325 <br /> 326 <br />Cy Stober: Mr. Chair, if I may, I just want to remind you of what this is tonight. So, to Mr. Proctor's point 327 <br />on Stroud’s Creek and the continued dialogue between the Department of Environment Agricultural Parks and 328 <br />Recreation about the possible trails networks and so on, so, this is the Concept Plan. It's not the Preliminary 329 <br />Plat. You can make a recommendation to the applicant. You can also make a recommendation to the Board of 330 <br />Commissioners, external to the entire subdivision process on a possible partnership or a role for DEAPR to have 331 <br />in either preserving and protecting or minimally developing that area for public access. So, that would be just 332 <br />initiated by this Board. It would need a separate motion and so forth, but when this comes back as a Preliminary 333 <br />Plat, just as a point of process, I would just offer you that guidance. There are things within the Major Subdivision 334 <br />review process that you can interact with the applicant on, but there's also maybe a recommendation about a 335 <br />significant resource that you may want to make a separate recommendation to the Board on, so just offering that 336 <br />feedback. 337 <br /> 338 <br />Chris Johnston: Our purpose isn't to make suggestions to the applicant. It's more to approve or deny based on 339 <br />UDO conformance and that sort of thing. We're not here to do the design. We can make suggestions, but in 340 <br />terms of what we're here to do, it either fits or it doesn't. 341 <br />Marilyn Carter: The UDO requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting which appears to have been well 342 <br />attended, and so I'm interested to know at that meeting what was the primary feedback? What specific actions, 343 <br />if any, were taken as a result of that feedback at that meeting? 344 <br /> 345 <br />Phil Koch: The majority of the design work in all honesty was pretty much in relation to comments from 346 <br />the DAC. The biggest thing that came up again, well there were two things, stormwater, which always comes up 347 <br />14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.