Browse
Search
5-1-24 PB Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
5-1-24 PB Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2024 7:51:28 PM
Creation date
4/25/2024 7:49:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
5_1_24 Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
against that private road. The Secondary Open Space also includes the remaining areas of slope with less than 100 <br />15 percent. The proposed Concept Plan in front of you all tonight, which includes the 18 lots. It gives an 101 <br />approximate location of building footprint and location of the future homes. Wells are also identified by the blue 102 <br />dots, as well as approximate septic areas are identified with the green. The blue kind of looking ponds are the 103 <br />approximate location of stormwater control measures on this site. Again, the 30-foot Type B Landscape Buffer is 104 <br />shown here along the western part of the site, and the proposed 50-foot public right of way is shown providing 105 <br />access to the 18 lots with a cul-de-sac at the end. The cul-de-sac does meet NC Fire Code. The proposed 106 <br />public road is subject to NCDOT design and construction standards, no roadway improvements are being 107 <br />required by NCDOT; however, a driveway permit will be required. The subdivision was presented at the 108 <br />February 1st Development Advisory Committee meeting. Comments are provided in Attachment 5. The 109 <br />Neighborhood Information Meeting was held by the applicant on February 13th. The NIM report is contained in 110 <br />Attachment 4 of your packets, and then tonight, here we are at the Planning Board Meeting for you to receive and 111 <br />review the Concept Plan, approving the Flexible Development Option, and then, as this moves forward, the 112 <br />Preliminary Plat will be coming back to you all on some time in the future for your recommendation to the BOCC. 113 <br />Per Section 2.15.2 of the UDO, the Planning Director is required to prepare and submit a recommendation on the 114 <br />Concept Plan to the Planning Board for consideration. This analysis from the application has been deemed 115 <br />complete in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.2 and 2.15.2 of the UDO. Staff has determined that 116 <br />the property is of sufficient size to support the proposed subdivision. Staff has determined that the Concept Plan 117 <br />should conform with the Development Standards of Article 6 and Subdivision Standards of Article 7 of the UDO, 118 <br />and staff supports the approval of the Flexible Development Option contained in Attachment 1. The Planning 119 <br />Director recommends the Board receive and discuss the Concept Plan application and approve the Flexible 120 <br />Development Option contained in Attachment 1. At this time, I don't know if you have any questions for staff or 121 <br />questions for the applicants. 122 <br /> 123 <br />Phil Koch: My name is Phil Koch, EarthCentric Engineering. We're out of Mebane. We've worked with 124 <br />Orange County for almost 30 years at this point, so, we're really happy to kind of be back in the area and do some 125 <br />additional work with the County. Most of the things that I do are 12-lot subdivisions or lower. So, I don't end up 126 <br />in front of you very often. This particular subdivision, I think, Ashley has presented very well. One of the things 127 <br />that the applicant was very good about doing, and chose to do from the very beginning of this, was to turn around 128 <br />and only utilize area that, for the most part, was already cleared. There are some trees that will be cleared. At 129 <br />the very end there's a cul-de-sac that's kind of unavoidable, but in order to make up for that, he's also providing 130 <br />that 49 percent plus open space. The entire Duke Power easement that's there is all part of the open space as 131 <br />well, so, none of the lots will extend back there. There is no reason for those lots to go back beyond that, so 132 <br />we've been able to maintain basically the entire stream buffer in the area there, all as part of the open space, and 133 <br />that will remain as is. Any trails that would be placed back there would be basically foot trails, and we would be 134 <br />working with the County in order to actually place those trails. So, with that in mind, if you have any questions, I'm 135 <br />happy to address them. 136 <br /> 137 <br />Statler Gilfillen: I have one simple question, I'm not sure I'm understanding. As I look at the plan here, over 138 <br />on this side up in the corner, it says “wall.” What is the wall? 139 <br /> 140 <br />Phil Koch: I believe there is an existing wall out there. That is not something that was put there. 141 <br /> 142 <br />Statler Gilfillen: When you say an existing wall, are we talking archaeological, 20th Century? Any idea what 143 <br />we’re talking about here? 144 <br /> 145 <br />Phil Koch: It's an old, like an old piece of a structure that's back that way. We are not touching that. 146 <br />That's in the open space. It will be maintained as it is and left there. 147 <br /> 148 <br />Statler Gilfillen: Has anybody contacted the Orange County Historic Board? 149 <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.