Browse
Search
Minutes 03-07-2024 - Business Meeting
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2024
>
Minutes 03-07-2024 - Business Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2024 4:41:51 PM
Creation date
4/17/2024 4:39:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/7/2024
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda 03-07-24; 12-1 - February 20, 2024 BOCC Meeting Follow-up Actions List
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 12-2 - Information Item - Tax Collector’s Report - Numerical Analysis
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 12-3 - Information Item - Tax Collector’s Report - Measure of Enforced Collections
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 12-4 - Information Item - Tax Assessor's Report - Releases Refunds under $100
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 6-a - Amendments to the Water and Sewer Management, Planning, and Boundary Agreement
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 6-b - Establishment of the Strategic Plan Performance Measurements Subcommittee
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 8-a - Minutes
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 8-b - Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases Refunds
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 8-c - Property Tax Releases Refunds
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 8-d - Late Application for Property Tax Exemption Exclusion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 8-e - Acceptance of NC 911 Board Portable Radio Grant and Approval of Budget Amendment #6-A
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 8-f - Procurement of Automated Fire-EMS Alerting System and Approval of Budget Amendment #6-B
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 8-g - Approval of the Fire Protection and Emergency Services Agreement with the Town of Carrboro
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 8-h - Approval of the Fire Protection and Emergency Services Agreement with the Town of Chapel Hil
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 8-i - Orange County Creek Week 2024 Proclamation
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda 03-07-24; 8-j - Boards and Commissions - Appointments
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
Agenda for March 7, 2024 BOCC Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 03-07-2024 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> and he has told everyone no. He said they even called him five times and the fifth call ended with <br /> the representative from the schools telling him that they can condemn and take his property if <br /> they needed to. He said his land is being taken from out from under him. He asked them to please <br /> think about this. <br /> Ian Scott said he is with the Chamber for a Greater Chapel Hill-Carrboro. He said this area <br /> of land is close to other developments, near UNC Hospital, and it is a regional infill opportunity. <br /> He said there is more planned in the south. He said this is an essential first step for planning. He <br /> said it is on an existing bus route. He said this is the first step in a meaningful plan that the Town <br /> of Chapel Hill will conduct. He said that staff is strained and asking them to spend time planning, <br /> when the biggest determining factor is the water and sewer and it is unknown, does not make <br /> sense. He said it does not change any of the existing development or building requirements. <br /> Claudia Fernandez said people did not know this was happening. She said it is important <br /> to listen to the people that live there. She said that the residents in the ETJ are not represented <br /> by anyone but the Board of Commissioners. She said they have been asking for more community <br /> meetings. She said they hear there is a rigorous development process and Chapel Hill controls <br /> 6% of the development. She said she has heard of the McMansions that exist when they do not. <br /> She said these homes were built in 1970s and on land that does not perk well. She said <br /> aggressive speculators are calling landowners already and they will not be able to afford to live <br /> anywhere else in Chapel Hill. She said they will lose land that helps with watershed concerns. <br /> She asked them to slow down so that everyone can understand what they are doing. She said <br /> that there is access to water and sewer for those that need it but bringing it to the area will open <br /> it for development that has not had enough analysis done. <br /> BJ Warshaw said for 40 years, the development in this area has been guided by the <br /> community. He said the 1992 Southern Small Area Plan marked this area as a way to conserve <br /> the environment and limit sprawl. He said at no point in time has there been a plan in the past 40 <br /> areas discussing denser development in the southern ETJ. He said development along 15-501 <br /> may be inevitable, but it will be a process spanning several decades and we can afford to pause <br /> here. He said the plans from OWASA, Orange County, and Chapel Hill have regularly marked the <br /> area as a small area plan that remains open space. He said that at no point in time has there <br /> been a plan that stipulates or discusses developing the area. He said that it is moving too quickly. <br /> Julie Coleman said she was called by the Carrboro lawyer and told that they would take <br /> her land under eminent domain for Carrboro High School. She said it was this group that saved <br /> her land. She said that rather than taking her home and her neighbor's home, they used land <br /> owned by an out of state developer. She said that one of her neighbors has 70 acres of land and <br /> there used to be a crystal-clear pond and it is no longer. She said that Smith Level Road is <br /> beautiful. She said she is not a person of great wealth, as the Chapel Hill Town Council referred <br /> to her, but she is thankful to have her land. She said that she hears affordable housing and wants <br /> that, but there must be money in the bank and Chapel Hill Town Council does not have the money <br /> in the bank. She said if the federal government is ready to give, then she might start listening. <br /> She said as long as the area stayed as farmland, Southern Village could be built. She said her <br /> space was used. She said the people that live there do not want this. <br /> Holly Fracarro, the CEO of the Homebuilders Association for Durham, Chatham, and <br /> Orange Counties, said that a "yes" vote is not a "yes" for any development. She said that Chapel <br /> Hill has a very rigorous process for developers to go through when rezoning. She said that a <br /> developer would likely cover the cost of affordable housing. She said a "yes" is simply a "yes" to <br /> an agreement that allows them to have thoughtful conversations with developers and allows the <br /> Town of Chapel Hill to negotiate with the developer. <br /> Dan Jewell said he has been designing communities in this part of the county for 40 years. <br /> He reiterated that this vote won't approve new development but will open the door for <br /> conversations to start. He said that the concerns are that the development will add to stormwater <br /> issues but again, the Town of Chapel Hill has the strongest regulations in the state. He said that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.