Orange County NC Website
14 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 398 Amy Eckberg: We're reallyjust trying to advocate with the building code council through various networks. We <br /> 399 all join together, and I'm talking about the towns and the counties, to be able to provide some language to <br /> 400 encourage them to revisit the building codes. So, right now,that's what we're trying to do -advocate as best that <br /> 401 we can for them to do that. <br /> 402 <br /> 403 Cy Stober: If I may, I think the building code council refers to it as liberalizing the building code, but basically <br /> 404 what that means is less and less oversight, less and less permitting by our own county and, therefore, less <br /> 405 opportunities for us to incentivize energy saving practices as well, through either fee structures or permitting, <br /> 406 which I think I made a comment when, last summer when they changed, for example, the minimum amount of <br /> 407 improvements that are made to a building that don't require any permits went from $20,000.00 to$40,000.00. <br /> 408 So, if you were doing $40,000.00 of improvements to your home, you don't require any permits, and that makes <br /> 409 what you're talking about, Statler, very difficult. Doesn't mean that it doesn't deserve advocacy as mentioned in <br /> 410 the plan and action. <br /> 411 <br /> 412 Statler Gilfillen: The second issue is, in the last month, a number of studies are starting to come out that EV <br /> 413 vehicles may actually in their lifetime be more pollutant than the conventional gas engine, and if we are pushing <br /> 414 to improve the EV, use of EV vehicles, are we, in fact, being counterproductive? I don't have an answer for this. <br /> 415 1 can only raise it based on what I'm reading in reports and in the news. <br /> 416 <br /> 417 Amy Eckberg: I don't think that we have a definitive answer for that either. I think there's been definitely some <br /> 418 issues that have been brought up in terms of the mining of lithium and the production of EVs in the batteries, and <br /> 419 then recycling and talking about, you know, there are some negatives to EVs, but I think the positives overall <br /> 420 outweigh the negatives, but I think the jury's still out and there's still research being done, so it's hard to say <br /> 421 definitively at this point. <br /> 422 <br /> 423 Statler Gilfillen: For a long time they've been talking about the high speed rail going from Raleigh to Charlotte <br /> 424 which would go through Orange County. I believe from my own experience being in Europe for a good portion of <br /> 425 my life, rail transit makes a big difference. Anything about the high speed rail, in particular, more than bus or <br /> 426 other? <br /> 427 <br /> 428 Amy Eckberg: I have not heard any updates on that. Do you all have any updated information? <br /> 429 <br /> 430 Cy Stober: It's going through the initial kind of feasibility analysis because it would actually be a high speed rail <br /> 431 line that connects Washington D.C.to New Orleans or Florida, I can't recall. But, yeah, it would use the rail bed. <br /> 432 So, we have a 200-foot right-of-way, railroad right-of-way that goes through Orange County. And — <br /> 433 <br /> 434 Statler Gilfillen: Has that already been defined? <br /> 435 <br /> 436 Cy Stober: Yes, it is already owned by the North Carolina Railroad. So, evaluating it for a new set of tracks, <br /> 437 because the existing tracks cannot accommodate vehicles traveling at that speed, is necessary. It's very likely <br /> 438 additional land will be needed to accommodate that line,and we're talking about decades in terms of making that <br /> 439 a reality. Our current president, as you know, is a big advocate of rail. He used the Acela for most of his career <br /> 440 commuting from Delaware to D.C. He would love to see it happen, but it takes a very long time and every state <br /> 441 has different ways of acquiring land and permitting. So that also adds complications to it. So it's at the very initial <br /> 442 levels of evaluation. <br /> 443 <br /> 444 Statler Gilfillen: My last comment, and I hope you can laugh a little bit at this. You made a reference to cycling <br /> 445 and walking. There are, in my opinion,two other common uses for those types of trails that seem to be ignored; <br /> 446 one would be for jogging. That's different than walking, and sometimes, the architectural planning needs are a <br />