Browse
Search
April 3 2024 ORC Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Ordinance Review Committee
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
April 3 2024 ORC Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2024 4:45:38 PM
Creation date
4/3/2024 4:41:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/3/2024
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
4_3_24 ORC Meeting Summary
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Ordinance Review Committee\Minutes\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> Section 6.13.4 of this Ordinance. <br /> This new standard is proposed as the new Section 4.2.4(A), "Residential Density, Density <br /> Exceedance Allowance". <br /> Accompanying this statutory amendment was one to Stormwater standards, that clarifies that, <br /> under such situations, only the new "built upon area" (aka "impervious surface") must be <br /> treated with Stormwater Control Measures, as required by State and federal laws; the existing <br /> BUA does not require stormwater treatment. The developer may elect to treat the existing <br /> BUA, and it may be offered as a condition of approval of a conditional zoning or special use <br /> permit application, but it cannot be required. This additional allowance is reflected in the new <br /> subsection (E) to Section 4.2.7 "Modifications of the Impervious Surface Ratio". <br /> Staff has initiated a relevant amendment to simplify interpretation and enforcement of stream <br /> buffer standards in unprotected watersheds, Section 6.13.5. Currently, there are two different <br /> buffer widths that can be applied, 50 or 65 feet. Staff is proposing to simplify this to a single <br /> standard of 65 feet in all unprotected watersheds for improved administration and enforcement <br /> of the standard, as well as deference to the standard that is more protective of water quality. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: There are no costs associated with this project other than the use of <br /> staff time and the required legal advertisement for the text amendment's public hearing. <br /> County staff has and will continue to accomplish the necessary tasks associated with <br /> amending the UDO and the legal advertisement will be paid from budgeted funds for this <br /> purpose. <br /> RECOMMENDATION(S): The Planning Director recommends the ORC review the proposed <br /> amendment and provide any feedback to staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.