Browse
Search
Agenda 04-02-24; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
Agenda - 04-02-2024 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 04-02-24; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2024 2:37:37 PM
Creation date
3/28/2024 2:31:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/2/2024
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for April 2, 2024 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2024\Agenda - 04-02-2024 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> 1 relevant was her point that we must actively preserve existing undeveloped forests, as well as <br /> 2 plant new trees, to aid in carbon sequestration. I ask you: what kind of environmental impact <br /> 3 would clear cutting 250 acres have (around 70% of the approximate 360 acres included in the <br /> 4 new boundary)? Without a plan, without guidelines, how can we be sure that development <br /> 5 pressure won't lead to worst case scenarios? <br /> 6 Today, you've also received a letter from the Southern Entryway Alliance with 66 signatures, <br /> 7 people in and around the southern area who want to see more planning and more community <br /> 8 engagement. Nearly every day over the past week, I've spoken with a neighbor who had little to <br /> 9 no idea what WASMPBA was, let alone what its amendment would mean. <br /> 10 So I close with this: the Board of County Commissioners has an opportunity. You, like I, may <br /> 11 agree with Chapel Hill's goals in principle — increasing missing middle housing, increasing <br /> 12 affordable housing, the Complete Communities Framework. But you can, for now, withhold your <br /> 13 vote to amend WASMPBA, and make your "yes" contingent upon additional analysis and public <br /> 14 information sessions. Let's find the win-win plan first — together — so that we actually achieve <br /> 15 those goals without disastrous and costly unintended side effects." <br /> 16 Terri Buckner read the following statement to the Board: <br /> 17 "I've listened to the Chapel Hill and Carrboro Town Councils discuss the WASMPBA expansion, <br /> 18 and it's clear this project is all about affordable housing. But those discussions have paid zero <br /> 19 attention to how much affordable housing already exists down here and how it might be <br /> 20 impacted. The two parcels identified for affordable housing so far clearly won't pay for the sewer <br /> 21 expansion so how much more market rate housing will be needed to justify that expense? No one <br /> 22 knows, especially since OWASA can't estimate the cost of the sewer line expansion until there is <br /> 23 a zoning plan. <br /> 24 In none of the discussions focused on affordable housing, have any of the elected officials asked <br /> 25 who will be displaced. Neither town has recognized or acknowledged the people currently living <br /> 26 in this area as part of their decision making. <br /> 27 At your seat is a table with a high-level profile of Who Lives in the Expansion Area? <br /> 28 Land records can't really tell us who they are, but they do provide clues. Two-thirds of the <br /> 29 residences were built prior to Southern Village. Some of these properties have been owned for <br /> 30 over 20 years, two for close to 50. The median size of the homes is 1,400 square feet and the <br /> 31 median lot size is just over 1 acre. There are million-dollar homes in the area, but there are more <br /> 32 affordable, low-income homes and there are several homes that the data leads me to believe are <br /> 33 quite low-income residences. But that's just me sitting here with GIS data. It's not the kind of <br /> 34 formal analysis I expect from my local governments before moving ahead with a major project. <br /> 35 Many of the homeowners and renters in the area are unaware of what is coming at them. These <br /> 36 residents.... these people.... deserve to be recognized and respected before their lives are turned <br /> 37 upside down. They especially don't deserve to be run out of their affordable homes for some <br /> 38 vague hope of building more affordable housing that is significantly more expensive than where <br /> 39 they currently live. <br /> 40 The town's stated vision includes no plan for bringing new businesses to the area and OWASA's <br /> 41 capacity analysis specifically stated it was for residential only. I suppose that means it will still be <br /> 42 closer to do our grocery shopping in Chatham County. And I'm sure the constant harassment by <br /> 43 land speculators will get worse. <br /> 44 Before you finalize your vote, please advocate for those residents. Make sure they understand <br /> 45 what is going to happen, the costs of annexation, the loss of the surrounding tree cover, and the <br /> 46 impact on their family finances. Listen to what they have to say before you turn their lives over to <br /> 47 a haphazard development process." <br /> 48 Valarie Schwartz said she has lived in the Southern ETJ for 25 years in the Dogwood <br /> 49 Acres community. She said the BOCC is the only government body that represents residents of <br /> 50 the ETJ. She said the elected officials in the Towns can say they voted to bring more affordable <br /> 51 housing, but said the County is responsible for the infrastructure in the ETJ, not the Towns. She <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.