Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-02-2005-8a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 11-02-2005
>
Agenda - 11-02-2005-8a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 4:56:59 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:39:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/2/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20051102
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />BACKGROUND: At the Board's January 24, 2005 regular meeting, representatives of a group <br />of Orange County residents addressed the Board and submitted a 1200 - signature petition to <br />the Board regarding the method by which the members of the Board of Commissioners are <br />elected in Orange County. The representatives requested that the Board review the current <br />method of election for the members of the Board, which entails all five members of the Board <br />being nominated and elected to staggered four -year terms on an at -large basis. The <br />representatives specifically requested, as stated in the petition, that the Board "alter the method <br />and manner by which Orange County Commissioners are elected to afford equal and fair <br />representation to the residents of the county by adopting NCGS 153- 58(3)b, permitting the <br />voters of Orange County to choose commissioners by electoral districts with each district being <br />as nearly equal in population as practicable." The petition continued, "Further, that the qualified <br />voters of each district nominate candidates and elect members who reside in the district for <br />seats apportioned to that district and that some of the commissioners, but not more than half of <br />the board, be allocated to the county as a whole, to be nominated and voted upon by the <br />qualified voters of the entire county." Neither those making the request nor the petition <br />submitted included any explanatory information or detailed any specific proposal regarding the <br />format or implementation of the requested district representation for the Board. <br />The County Manager and County staff reviewed the issue and the petition submitted and <br />provided a report to the Board at the Board's May 5, 2005 work session. The report included <br />information on the following: <br />1) the legal framework for structure of boards of county commissioners; <br />2) the various methods of at -large election, district election, and combination of at- <br />large /district election utilized for boards of commissioners in the 99 other North Carolina <br />counties; <br />3) a history of past discussions by the Orange County Board of Commissioners in regard to <br />Board representation and election; <br />4) some limited boundaries and statistical information showing the population distribution as <br />it may relate to the consideration /formulation of district representation for Orange County. <br />The report was not intended to be an investigation of the benefits, costs, opportunities, hurdles, <br />or timelines that may be associated with the consideration and possible implementation of <br />district representation for the Board of Commissioners. It was intended to provide an initial <br />framework of information upon which the Board of Commissioners could deliberate and <br />determine as appropriate any further steps in evaluating this issue and responding to the <br />request and petition submitted. The Board subsequently scheduled and conducted two public <br />hearings on August 24 and August 31, 2005 to receive input from the public on this issue. <br />After the August 31st public hearing, the Chair solicited input from other BOCC members on <br />potential district election ideas /frameworks that the Board could consider as a next step in the <br />review process. In addition, the Chair and Vice Chair provided direction and feedback to staff in <br />the development of initial draft mapping and associated materials that followed the <br />ideas /frameworks provided. <br />These actions led to BOCC discussion at the Board's October 17, 2005 work session on five <br />initial draft maps /plans, an introductory preamble, a draft set of Principles, and a draft <br />Process/Timetable, all prepared in concert with ideas /input/frameworks outlined by BOCC <br />members. The five initial draft maps /plans were provided based on staff's work with population <br />numbers and precinct lines, and at the October 17 meeting, the Board agreed to move forward <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.