Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Attachment 8 168 <br /> STATEMENT OF INCONSISTENCY <br /> OF A PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS MAP AMENDMENT <br /> WITH THE ADOPTED ORANGE COUNTY 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND <br /> OTHER APPLICABLE ADOPTED PLANS <br /> An applicant-initiated amendment (MA23-0003) to the Zoning Atlas has been reviewed to <br /> rezone a parcel as follows: <br /> Parcel Owner of <br /> Identification Township Record Current Zoning Proposed Zoning <br /> Number (PIN) <br /> • ASE-CD <br /> (Agricultural <br /> • RB (Rural Buffer); Support Enterprises <br /> 9871-50-3254 Chapel Acer, LLC • Jordan Lake — Conditional <br /> Hill Unprotected District); <br /> Watershed • Jordan Lake <br /> Unprotected <br /> Watershed <br /> The Board of County Commissioners hereby finds: <br /> a. The requirements of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance <br /> Amendments of the UDO have been reviewed and determined to be unacceptable due <br /> to either the potential impacts upon surrounding properties or a lack of final conditions <br /> on the site plan, as required by Sections 2.5 and 2.9.1(C)(1)(a) of the Orange County <br /> UDO: <br /> - Placement of wood chips, stumps and logs, branches and similar wood by- <br /> products within 100 feet of the residentially-zoned property boundaries; <br /> - Allowance for changes in the exact placement of features and structures within <br /> the limits if disturbance and designated "activity area" on the site plan, subject to <br /> staff review and approval; <br /> - Allowance for lighting plan to be altered from what is submitted, provided that all <br /> outdoor pole lights not to exceed 14' and not be located outside the proposed <br /> "activity area" on the site plan, subject to staff review and approval; and, <br /> b. Pursuant to Sections 1.1.5 Statement of Intent - Amendments, and 1.1.7 Conformance <br /> with Adopted Plans of the UDO and to Section 160D-604(d) Planning Board review and <br /> comment — Plan Consistency and 160D-605(a) Governing Board Statement — Plan <br /> Consistency of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds that the <br /> amendment is inconsistent with the "Rural Buffer" classification, as defined in the 2030 <br /> Comprehensive Plan: Land adjacent to an urban or transition area which is rural in <br /> character and which should remain rural, contain very low-density residential uses, and <br /> not require urban services during the plan period. <br />