Agenda - 06-27-2002-10b - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

2 There are many conditions within the County SUP that exhibit the close coordination with Hillsborough on many issues of utilities and architecture. Also pursuant to annexation law, the annexing municipality would have to prepare a report on the feasibility of providing the project with public services. A letter from Eric Peterson (June 6) and Town Board discussion on June 10 found that Hillsborough does not have enough information to conduct an analysis at this time and since the project would be a satellite annexation, there.would be question whether the project would exceed the town's percentage limits of satellite annexation. If annexation does occur pursuant to Section 160A-45-49, the undeveloped land within the previous county Planned Development (PD) and SUP would be subject to the laws and ordinances (including zoning)of the municipality. In other words, the County zoning authority and SUP conditions would be expunged and be replaced by a new duly enacted zoning designation from Hillsborough. Hillsborough would process and approve how the remainder of the undeveloped land would be built: In summary, the options from the developer to change conditions have been forwarded from the county in the form of a letter dated May 22. This available amendment process may have prompted the letter of June 4 by the developer to Hillsborough requesting annexation to forego county zoning/SUP conditions. At this time, Hillsborough cannot act on the request until more development information is given and suggested dialogue between county/town commissioners is achieved. 3. OSBORN RESPONSE Ms, Susan Osborn, a resident of Churton Grove, had questions concerning the timing and construction of the pool/clubhouse and what help/requirements the County could impose on the development. The attached material outlines the responses. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board receive the report.