Orange County NC Website
MINUTES-Draft <br /> ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH <br /> October 25, 2023 <br /> individuals in hardship and does not send people who are genuinely working to pay their bills to <br /> collections. However, there are some folks who are genuinely trying to take advantage of the <br /> system, and so there needs to be a mechanism for accountability. She added that set off does <br /> not involve wage garnishing, and instead collects from state tax refunds and lottery winnings. <br /> Mr. Perschau further clarified that the department makes significant attempts to resolve the <br /> outstanding debt in other ways before resorting to set-off. Dr. Jonnal said that she felt better <br /> about the debt set-off process given there were multiple pathways for people in need to receive <br /> care. <br /> In response to Dr. Royce's question about whether there might be issues with cost satisfaction <br /> related to the services, Ms. Spey shared that there is an item in the customer satisfaction <br /> surveys about cost. <br /> Motion to approve the transfer from active to inactive status of$4,162 in bad debt, thus <br /> writing it off without collection, was made by Dr. Alison Stuebe, seconded by Dr. Rachel <br /> Royce, and carried without dissent. <br /> D. Presentation of New Septic and Well Rules <br /> Ms. Hudson presented information about the proposed updates to the septic and well rules for <br /> Orange County, which will be put to a vote at the November BOH meeting. She clarified that the <br /> proposed rules are specifically regarding on-site wastewater regulations. <br /> Ms. Hudson shared a brief history of wastewater regulations at the state level in North Carolina, <br /> which were originally created in the 1970s and have been periodically amended over the years. <br /> During this time, Orange County has abided by their own local codes, which comply with but are <br /> more stringent than the state's. Ms. Hudson explained that on January 1st, 2024, substantial <br /> revisions to the state regulations will pass, and that these revisions have been in the works <br /> since roughly 2005. She added that these new revisions are very similar in content to Orange <br /> County's codes but are numbered differently and a bit less stringent. As such, regardless of the <br /> board's decision regarding the proposed Orange County wastewater rules, the existing 2015 <br /> Orange County rules will have to be rescinded, as they will no longer be in compliance with the <br /> state's rules. Ms. Hudson said that if the proposed rules she is presenting are not adopted, <br /> Orange County will default to following the state guidelines. She also added that the rules she is <br /> presenting are essentially the same as the ones already in place in Orange County, simply <br /> updated to follow the state's new numbering conventions. <br /> Dr. Stuebe asked Ms. Hudson to define the term "Redoximorphic features," which Ms. Hudson <br /> had used in her explanation of the history and revisions to the codes. Ms. Hudson briefly <br /> explained that this essentially means the minerals (and thus color) have been stripped from the <br /> soil due to water percolation, turning it gray. <br /> In response to Mr. Whitaker's question, Ms. Hudson confirmed that all the highlighted portions <br /> of the proposed wastewater rules that the board members had been given were instances <br /> where Orange County's codes were stricter than the forthcoming state guidelines. <br /> Ms. Hudson shared that all Orange County septic tank contractors had the opportunity to review <br /> the proposed Orange County rules and had no criticism or recommended changes. She listed <br /> some examples of the policies Orange County wishes to retain (such as four inches of gravel <br /> below a septic tank or keeping septic tanks on risers) and speculated that most lawmakers are <br /> S:\Managers Working Files\BOH\Agenda&Abstracts\2023 Agenda&Abstracts/ <br /> October Page 8 <br />