Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
42 <br /> 1 Robert Williams said there were discussions and SWAG raised their hand in support of 3 <br /> 2 if some of the new fees were offset with new revenues. <br /> 3 Commissioner Fowler said it becomes more expensive as you move through the <br /> 4 scenarios. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Slide #23 <br /> Key Impacts of Road to Zero Waste Scenarios <br /> SINGLE-STREAM <br /> RECYCLING <br /> The <br /> 'A <br /> T I ,111 a I t <br /> ! ! <br /> Waste Rin�deritial Tonnage at 25% <br /> Plan includes impacts <br /> on diversion tonnages <br /> ude <br /> 1 , <br /> tablesas described in the <br /> .rTh R <br /> ! ` <br /> Additional Tonnage:Cumulative <br /> +r _ <br /> Note:Financial impacts are <br /> modeled at 25% Residential Tonnage at 259b <br /> for residentlal only. Net Tip Fee!LEB „ „ ,1+ I 1 I r <br /> 7 <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Slide #24 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Eubanks Road Disposal Facility �1 <br /> Possible Concept for the Future <br /> deed to improve the Material Recovery Facility <br /> now located at Manks Read. <br /> 1 Anew Covered faclfity to address transfer/ <br /> processing of 55R and incorporate other mater''.al <br /> streams that are new Separated in the locatior. <br /> ► Staffing efficiencies could be gained by co-located <br /> material recovery operations to a single localiort. <br /> M Master plan needed to laok at relocating <br /> maintenan a facility and yard to make room for <br /> expanded processing capability, <br /> Reflecting adjacent CommufTV concerns, --- <br /> arr olternate site sfioufd also be considered. <br /> 10 <br />