Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-07-2005-6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 09-07-2005
>
Agenda - 09-07-2005-6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:57:31 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:39:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/7/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20050907
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
RES-2005-068 Comments to the Transp Ad Comm the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metro Planning
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 2 18 <br />DCHC urban area "is committed to developing a balanced transportation system within the <br />region." The MPO should begin the annual TIP process with goal setting, which could <br />merely be a reaffinnation of previous goals or development of new goals arising out of the <br />Transportation Plan. This annual goal setting will ensure that any change in "need" can be <br />captured in the TIP goals. <br />2. Ranking Criteria <br />The Screening criteria for project ranking fall into four broad groups: <br />a. Regional Goals - How well does the project meet the adopted regional goals? Is the <br />project an element of the current long-range plan? Does it implement community objectives <br />(for the intrastate system, does it meet NCDOT mobility objectives)? Does the project <br />have abroad base of local support? <br />b. Cost Effectiveness -How much benefit does the project offer compared to the estimated <br />cost? <br />c. Timing Factor -Is timing a critical element for the project (one-time opportunity)? Will <br />the opportunity to do the project be lost if it is not in the current priority cycle? <br />d. Specific Project Merits -How many points does a project receive using scoring criteria? <br />The scoring criteria are described below in the "Application of The Methodology" section.. <br />APPLICATION OF THE METHODOLOGY <br />1. The TCC first examines the consistency in which local jurisdictions have responded to the <br />ten (10) project criteria. If the criteria are not applied consistently, the TCC can agree to <br />change some criteria responses for consistency among all projects. <br />2 Project Criteria Points are totaled for each project request using the point system outlined on <br />pages 5 and 6 of this document. <br />Degree of Congestion - This category awards points to roadway projects base on the <br />congestion level as measured in the volume to capacity (V/C) ratio. For new road <br />facilities in which traffic counts are not available, volumes on a parallel existing facility <br />may be used,. <br />Safety (Accidents/l 00 Million Vehicle Miles) - Safety points are awarded to projects with <br />reported accident rates significantly greater than statewide averages for urban road <br />segments - the statewide average is 330 to 370 accidents per 100 million vehicle miles <br />(or, 330-370 ACC/100 MVM).. Points may be awarded to transit, non-motorized and <br />Transportation Demand Management (TDA) projects using the accident rate of the <br />roadway on which they operate, or of a parallel roadway, For bicycle and pedestrian <br />projects, auto accidents may be used if bike/pedestrian features are being added to an <br />Page 33 <br />DCHC MPO -Regional Priority List for FY 2007-2013 MTIP
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.