Browse
Search
1.3.24 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
1.3.24 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2024 4:09:01 PM
Creation date
3/1/2024 4:07:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/3/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
1-3-24 PB Agenda Packet
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED WITH AMENDMENT 2.7.24 <br /> 598 need one in the Chapel Hill/Carrboro area. Chapel Hill and Orange County would like to jointly develop one. <br /> 599 So that's the property we're talking about. <br /> 600 <br /> 601 Beth Bronson: And the entrance to the east of those are privately owned, or there's a railroad track <br /> 602 there? <br /> 603 <br /> 604 David Stancil: I think the Town of Chapel Hill owns the property that's further to the right of the two <br /> 605 Orange County labeled properties on this map, and then you're at Millhouse Road and the railroad tracks. But <br /> 606 as you can see, the concern that we addressed, and I hope that we found a solution to, you can see on this <br /> 607 map that the existing access road that was done years and years ago for Crown Castle to be able to access <br /> 608 their tower severs 20 acres of our site from the rest of it, and I can count on my hands the number of times I've <br /> 609 seen a Crown Castle truck go back to the cell tower. So, that's not really been an issue for us, but if that were <br /> 610 to become something that was much more frequently used, and we had parking or soccer fields, for example, <br /> 611 we don't want kids crossing a commercial driveway to go back and forth between future fields and parking. <br /> 612 And so that was the concern that we expressed in our memo. We looked at the possibly of diving down to the <br /> 613 southern boundary line adjacent to the grey area on this map. Not a great solution, but as mentioned earlier <br /> 614 we had a meeting today. We did identify the fact that there is another access easement on the northern part of <br /> 615 the property. This is the way in for the Crown Castle tower which is being proposed for use here. We had, in <br /> 616 our letter, suggested diving down and not separating this 20-acre section from the rest of the park. But, as of <br /> 617 today, I think we have a potential solution which will use this easement and wrap around the back side of the <br /> 618 soccer fields and the future facility. We haven't done a master plan yet because it wasn't time to build the <br /> 619 park. We've stopped doing those because we ran into situations where we had an adopted master plan and <br /> 620 10 years later, we were getting around to the construction, and things would change. So, we try to do master <br /> 621 plans now closer to the point of construction, and that's why we envision doing that in the next year or two for <br /> 622 this currently planned construction. But, what we have always envisioned is back here, backing up to Duke <br /> 623 Forest, this part of the property has nice hard woods, and is much more like Duke Forest than the rest of the <br /> 624 property. These areas in the front were former farm fields. This was the old Julia Blackwood farm. And so, <br /> 625 what we would like to do, and what we have talked today, and I think is a possible solution, is come around the <br /> 626 back side of the fields. <br /> 627 <br /> 628 Beth Bronson: You don't anticipate development to the west? <br /> 629 <br /> 630 David Stancil: No, this, I think, would be trails and hard wood buffer to Duke Forest. So, the anticipated <br /> 631 area of development of this property is in this area here. <br /> 632 <br /> 633 Beth Bronson: Duke Forest does not have anything that backs up to those properties? <br /> 634 <br /> 635 David Stancil: Duke Forest has access, their area actually goes right off the map to the south and to the <br /> 636 east. <br /> 637 <br /> 638 Beth Bronson: They have separate access on that Orange County property? <br /> 639 <br /> 640 David Stancil: No, they do not. There was originally a continuation of this easement that I've talked <br /> 641 about already that goes to the Duke property, but I'm not, without getting into some legal territory that I should <br /> 642 not get into, it's not clear to us whether this part of that easement continues to exist. But suffice to say, that <br /> 643 Duke has the ability to access this property from a number of other directions. This is also,just so you know, <br /> 644 this is a part of Duke Forest, the Blackwood Division of Duke Forest, that has the NASA research equipment <br /> 645 on it, so it's not one of the areas that's active for recreational purposes. There are not a lot of trails here. In <br /> 646 fact, they're kind of discouraged for that purpose because there is a lot of scientific research going on back in <br /> 647 this part of the property, so there's not a lot of access need in that area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.