Browse
Search
3-6-24 PB Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
3-6-24 PB Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2024 3:48:26 PM
Creation date
2/29/2024 3:48:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/6/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
3_6_24 Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
100 <br />Leigh Anne King: Leaving it open is an option. The one thing I would caution you about with respect to that 101 <br />is I would recommend that if you're going to be asking the public to take a survey, you want to use the data. 102 <br />And we can't continuously be changing the report. So, I think that's one of the challenges of doing it that way. 103 <br /> 104 <br />Beth Bronson: Absolutely. I mean, I agree 100 percent with you in respect to that and I understand the 105 <br />design of using the data set to move forward to second and third. I guess that makes sense and if County had 106 <br />a section of, “here, you want to answer these questions separate from this and move those questions to a 107 <br />different location,” I could understand that. 108 <br /> 109 <br />Leigh Anne King: And there's also an opportunity to reach out and provide comment at any point and time 110 <br />through the website. But I think we can kind of take into account what you're concerned about. Should there 111 <br />always be a place for someone to kind of express their interest or concerns? 112 <br /> 113 <br />Beth Bronson: Yeah you would want to state you're not using that anymore but these responses could be 114 <br />used by the County at a later date. I think it would be valuable data for the County in a way. 115 <br /> 116 <br />Cy Stober: If I may interject – This is a constant struggle for planners when we do plans of any scale, 117 <br />small area plans, corridor plans, neighborhood block plans, or a county-wide comprehensive land use plan, is 118 <br />you have to close the survey if you're going to use it. And this is a critical part of informing the values that will 119 <br />inform the model and work that we're going to do in the next steps of the project. And so, we do have to close 120 <br />the survey and we certainly don't want to mislead the public that if they participate, that input will then be used. 121 <br />Because we can't use it at this point. We will be doing other outreach and engagement; I believe that will 122 <br />probably include some other survey work. And there will, of course, always be opportunities, Tom has set up a 123 <br />good email address for people to get in touch about this planning effort. And we're working closely with 124 <br />community relations staff as well to use social media and get the word out and get feedback through those 125 <br />avenues, too. So, I completely hear you, Ms. Bronson. We'd love to be able to somehow in real time just have 126 <br />a constant feed into the models and have them adjust accordingly, but it's not possible and we have to make 127 <br />the hard decision on when to close the window. 128 <br /> 129 <br />Beth Bronson: And I would agree with that. I wouldn't want there to be like an open survey that didn't 130 <br />count or anything like that that may even keep somebody from filling out the survey you do want data on. I 131 <br />don't think you would want to change anything based on that. But if there is a way, yeah, to have those 132 <br />responses kind of in a repository. That's great. 133 <br /> 134 <br />Liz Kalies: I don't have any questions. But also thank you. It was really thorough and really thought 135 <br />provoking so really nice work. Appreciate it. 136 <br /> 137 <br />Delores Bailey: The number of people that answered the survey was only 604? 138 <br /> 139 <br />Leigh Anne King: For the Strategic Plan Survey. For a statistically significant survey for Orange County 140 <br />based on your population, it was supposed to be 580 responses or something like that that I read in the report. 141 <br />So, they actually exceeded the number to meet that statistically significant threshold. I know it's, for the non-142 <br />statisticians like myself, it's always hard to think that that many people can be representative of a body that's 143 <br />way larger than that. But what they do is they look at, they do a random sampling and they also go through 144 <br />and check for all of the socio-demographics to make sure that those are representative of the larger 145 <br />community as well. The community engagement we conducted is self-selected. So, we do look at how 146 <br />representative it is of the community. But it is not statistically significant because those folks chose to 147 <br />participate, they're not randomly sampled. 148 <br /> 149 <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.