Browse
Search
3-6-24 PB Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
3-6-24 PB Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2024 3:48:26 PM
Creation date
2/29/2024 3:48:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/6/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
3_6_24 Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
resources available for making such informed decisions. North Carolina's Department of Environmental 547 <br />Quality and the Environmental Protection Agency, to name just two. Answers to the challenges posed to our 548 <br />environment by climate change and to our watersheds by Urban Stream Syndrome, are inextricably linked to 549 <br />our land use policy, and thus provide us with a relatively clear path forward. Science-based reforms to our 550 <br />Comprehensive Land Use Plan will contribute to solving those long-term environmental issues that we face 551 <br />together. Now is the time to listen to the boots-in-the-water and bring our UDO into compliance with the 552 <br />science. 553 <br /> 554 <br />John Dempsey provided a handout of watershed neutral planning and development to the Board. 555 <br /> 556 <br />Margo Lakin: Good evening, my name is Margo Lakin. I live in Hillsborough. I attended the public input 557 <br />session on January 20. My husband attended the one in Cedar Grove on January 19th. Both sessions saw 558 <br />staggering numbers of concerned citizens who I would argue are the ultimate stakeholders in all of this. Past 559 <br />and current board members from Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Hillsborough spoke to the importance of 560 <br />protecting the watersheds and the rural buffers and our tree canopy and our biodiversity. Past County 561 <br />commissioners shared how they fought for the Rural Buffer back in the day, as they vehemently encouraged 562 <br />us to do the same now. It was alive and clearly articulated consensus we need a science-based 563 <br />Comprehensive Land Use Plan. We need to hear from the scientists, the experts, who have the concrete data 564 <br />needed to make land use decisions. I also want to remind everyone that during the pandemic, many of us 565 <br />were able to put food on our tables, thanks to the farmers of Orange County who were able to farm only 566 <br />because of the Rural Buffer. We must remember this is Orange County. This isn't Chatham or Johnston or 567 <br />Durham or Alamance. It's imperative to listen to the citizens in creating a Comprehensive Land Use Plan that 568 <br />reflects our wants and our needs. I see Thank Science signs in many yards throughout the County. If we 569 <br />want to truly thank science, it's time we bring science to the table when creating this Comprehensive Land Use 570 <br />Plan. Thank you. 571 <br /> 572 <br />Rob Minton: Thank you for allowing us to speak in public in this very important meeting. My name is 573 <br />Rob Minton. I've lived in Hillsborough, 25, 30 years, and one of the things that we appreciate of this area is the 574 <br />rural buffers. It needs to be emphasized over and over again. The reason it was created is because of the 575 <br />positive impacts that it has on the community as a whole. That's why people come here. I think that's why this 576 <br />county is unique. Compared to other counties, they have sort of bellied up to lax zoning laws and things that 577 <br />happened in Mebane here, recently with Buc-ee's, with very little environmental concerns. Anyway, wanted to 578 <br />emphasize that science, I agree with the previous speaker, science-based evidence is important here, as well 579 <br />as it is to emphasize the fact that there needs to be... the stakeholders here, I feel, are the people who spoke 580 <br />out in public, and I appreciate the survey having us. I was one of the attendees at this one on January the 581 <br />20th and I was very impressed by the fact that so many people overwhelmingly want to keep this community 582 <br />intact with the rural buffers. The reason things have been very different and unique here is because of that 583 <br />and I would like to certainly continue to encourage this committee and survey to include that within their overall 584 <br />presentation. One question that I have here, is actually who are the stakeholders? I agree with one of the 585 <br />Planning Board members that it seems to be a little disconnect here, with one side, I don't even know who the 586 <br />stakeholders are. I don't know if any of us do, other than to survey, the consultation people, that wasn't 587 <br />addressed at all. If the stakeholders are pro-development, I've got a real problem with that. I think public input 588 <br />is important here and I just wanted to close out by saying please keep the current rural buffers. They're so 589 <br />important. Thank you. 590 <br /> 591 <br />Lamar Proctor read out the list of stakeholder interviews from the packet and asked if there was input from an 592 <br />scientific resources in terms of ecological protection. 593 <br /> 594 <br />Leigh Anne King confirmed that one part of the consultant team is Equinox, a group with landscape architects 595 <br />and others focused on the science and the planning of natural lands. 596 <br />17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.