Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
2. CHCCS (Rani): only concern was that this would <br /> put us further behind in timeline to improve <br /> capital improvements <br /> 3. Renee: What are the next steps after the Joint <br /> Meeting on the 29 h? Do we need another group <br /> to work on this? <br /> a. Rani: agree and don't try to create the <br /> scope of work at the Joint Meeting <br /> i. Need next step slide with action <br /> items —keep out of the weeds on <br /> the 29tn <br /> ii. Jean: do the school boards want to <br /> look at the RFQ? <br /> 1. Do we want the RFQ out <br /> by the end of October <br /> 2. Rani: agrees with timeline <br /> but anticipates all boards <br /> will want to look at RFQ <br /> 3. Bonnie: circulate RFQ to <br /> boards and deal with <br /> comments outside of a <br /> meeting <br /> 4. Jean: how long would we <br /> give for respondents to <br /> reply? <br /> a. Gary: about 4 <br /> weeks. Will use <br /> the Guilford RFQ <br /> as a template to <br /> use as a starting <br /> point. Gary will <br /> follow up with <br /> more specifics <br /> about timeframe <br /> 5. Bonnie: Very impressed <br /> that Gary went out and did <br /> benchmarking — could we <br /> add this as an early slide to <br /> show we aren't alone in <br /> approaching this issue? <br /> a. All agree <br /> iv. Jean: should this group develop a subgroup to review <br /> submitted qualifications? <br /> 1. Gary: 3 facility managers(county,both districts), <br /> 2. Rani: maybe subgroup makes a recommendation <br /> and BOCC make the final award. Could we add <br />