Orange County NC Website
1. The more prescriptive the <br /> approach, the less <br /> flexibility. <br /> 2. Can be some construction <br /> standards to get the <br /> greatest ROI <br /> a. Who is reviewing <br /> everyone's plans <br /> to prevent scope <br /> creep? <br /> iii. Alan — for OC facilities (about <br /> —45) — just having a facility <br /> assessment for each facility isn't <br /> enough (also need costs to keep <br /> up,what is the use of the building <br /> and how does it fit into county <br /> program needs) — we use that <br /> when deciding what to do about <br /> county facilities <br /> iv. Rani — agree with collaborative <br /> planning — especially for HVAC <br /> replacements — can we use <br /> economies of scale in <br /> purchasing/contracting? <br /> 1. Also important to allow <br /> districts to have flexibility <br /> to meet local needs <br /> v. Al — Knowing OC is the pass <br /> through — there could be joint <br /> RFPs for certain bids such as all <br /> facilities to have solar arrays (in <br /> each CIP but use single company <br /> that manages that and keeps to <br /> agreed upon standards) <br /> 1. OC happy to be a part of <br /> that <br /> vi. Nick — after finishing a large <br /> project at Orange High(converted <br /> to geothermal while school was in <br /> full function) — his biggest <br /> concern about the report is extra <br /> swing space <br /> 1. Able to push through a ton <br /> of projects already funded <br /> but don't have enough <br /> swing space <br />