Browse
Search
Agenda - February 15, 2023 School Capital Needs Workgroup Agenda with notes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Schools Capital Needs Workgroup
>
2023
>
Agenda - February 15, 2023 School Capital Needs Workgroup Agenda with notes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2024 3:30:27 PM
Creation date
2/29/2024 3:25:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/15/2023
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o Rani concurs with Bonnie and Patrick. Appreciates workgroup forum for <br /> interim needs. <br /> • Bonnie asks if we can do an interim capital plan until consultant work is done, <br /> currently needs to provide 10 year plan to county. <br /> o Jean recommends continuing 10 year plan, as consultant has not yet been <br /> approved by board. <br /> o Kirk says county needs a 10 year plan, as it is important for the county to <br /> understand its debt capacity. Helps county understand size for next bond <br /> issuance. Also, the board only approves year 1 of the CIP, and the rest <br /> functions as a plan, which can change for year to year. <br /> o Al says there is still a plan to use funding for major maintenance projects. <br /> Sees the consultant's role is to help for bond issuance and the next steps. <br /> o Patrick states there needs to be understanding that long range plans are <br /> based on estimates from 10 year old plans. So long as that estimate is <br /> understood. <br /> o Travis confirms that we need dollar amounts for out years; that exact <br /> projects can change. <br /> • Jean asks that we get the document that shows the unfunded needs, not just the <br /> funding amounts. <br /> o Kirk — when we provide forms to schools we do ask for unfunded needs, <br /> which is tracked year to year. <br /> o Jean—asks if that is given by year. <br /> o Kirk—is given as a 10 year total, not by year. <br /> o Rani—we can provide a signal based on current assessment, but consultant <br /> will provide that information in more detail. <br /> 5. Next Meeting is TBD <br /> • Jean—suggests every 2 months from this month-April, June, and August. <br /> • Jean suggests April Meeting to discuss CIPs. <br /> o Kirk—April meeting will occur after Manager presents Recommended CIP. <br /> o Patrick—useful to have CIP discussion to coordinate projects to bid. <br /> • Jean suggests using April Meeting to meet with consultant,to assess scope of work. <br /> • Rani request SAFPOTEC update at April Meeting. Wants this group to have input <br /> on that process. <br /> o Jean asks when if there will be a formal plan at April meeting,may be better <br /> for June meeting. <br /> o Perdita—SAPFOTEC will receive presentation from OREd,will determine <br /> pace of next steps. <br /> o Bonnie asks if there is guidance on an upcoming needed redistricting based <br /> on Mebane growth. <br /> ■ Cy — staff have draft of SAPFO annual report which includes <br /> projections from 5 models. <br /> ■ Patrick — SAPFO, OREd and other models play a role in <br /> reassignment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.