Orange County NC Website
3 <br /> • We have reached a clear and transparent understanding of how our watersheds will <br /> be protected <br /> Thank you." <br /> Terri Buckner provided 3 maps to the Board for reference and read from the following <br /> prepared statement: <br /> "Water supply watersheds are those watersheds that drain directly into a community drinking <br /> water source. <br /> According to Chapel Hill's Mayor and Planning staff, Chapel Hill's watershed drains to Jordan <br /> Lake and has no impact on University Lake. I've attached three maps to this email. Chapel Hill's <br /> water supply watershed is outlined in green on Map 1. It drains to Jordan Lake and is classified <br /> as WS-IV. Map 2 is the state map of the eastern section of the University Lake watershed in <br /> Carrboro which is a WS-11 (more sensitive). On Map 2, the eastern boundary of the watershed (in <br /> pink) weaves in and out around Smith Level Road and then extends further east across 15-501 <br /> at the southern tip. <br /> Several weeks ago, I notified Chapel Hill staff of the discrepancy between their map (Map 1) and <br /> the state map (Map 2). Late last week they notified me that I was correct and shared the modified <br /> map (Map 3). <br /> The Chapel Hill LUMO is written using the WS-IV standards provided by the state in March 2023. <br /> However, according to the state, if any portion of a water supply watershed is classified as WS- <br /> 11, then the entire area must be treated as WS-11. That's a difference of 70% built upon vs 30% <br /> built upon for zoning. <br /> The town staff have not yet weighed in on that claim. However, if it is true, it means that moving <br /> the urban services boundary southward will not provide the level of density the Town Council is <br /> expecting and creates a serious conflict between the desire for development in this area and the <br /> desire to protect our drinking water supply. To me, getting that clarification is something that needs <br /> to be investigated before any change to WASMPBA. <br /> As a result of this new information, I request that you direct your staff to work with the state and <br /> the town of Chapel Hill to determine if the entire area south of Southern Village needs to be <br /> reclassified as WS-11 for zoning purposes. <br /> Building dense development up to the edges of the WS-11 zone puts our drinking water at risk. It's <br /> easy to put a line on the map but harder to ensure that water follows those lines. For that reason, <br /> I believe we need some kind of transition area created along the borders of the WS-11 lands. My <br /> second request is that you direct County staff to work with town staff to set up a transition zone <br /> between the WS-11 and WS-IV lands to protect the more sensitive WS-11 environment when <br /> development does occur around 15-501. That protection is necessary to ensure "proper <br /> management" of our water resources and to control the costs of drinking water treatment." <br /> Andrew Lindstrom from Collins Creek Drive, spoke about the proposed Orange Grove <br /> Waste Facility. He thanked the Board members, OWASA members, and the American Legion <br /> Post for coming out to see the site for the proposed waste facility and hosting a public information <br /> session. He said no one wants the facility at this location and said it will create a lot of problems <br /> with traffic, will disrupt everything the community cherishes, and will cause issues for children at <br /> the bus stop. He asked the Board to rescind this proposal. <br /> Joyce McGuire said her land joins the OWASA biohazard field. She thanked the board <br /> members for coming out to see the proposed site. She said there are traffic hazards on the road <br /> now and the waste facility would exacerbate it. She said this would cause problems at the bus <br /> stop. She said it would devastate their community. <br /> Livy Ludington said she is concerned and disappointed about Chapel Hill's recent vote to <br /> amend WASMPBA. She said she feels like the decision was rushed and there was pressure by <br /> the Chamber of Commerce. She said they did not follow the planning process. She said she is <br /> worried about the environmental impact of extending the urban service boundary without having <br /> all of the information. She said there are traffic issue, but she is more concerned about the <br />