Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
39 <br /> Preston made reference to page 41 and asked about the fiscal impel. Derelict said that the <br /> majority of the elements are based on the most rent budget ofthe County and the tan rate at the <br /> times Pradesh questioned that five houses in this subdivision would body generate 13 panels. <br /> Benedict said that the generation rate was 2.55 people per household <br /> Preston asked about page 45 and why the pmjected emodment for the Orange Cowry School <br /> systemwasodyinerems byninefiom2002to2011. Benedictsaidthatth estatisficslsmdies <br /> for Orange County show that the average amount of children generated for a single-&roily house <br /> is.33 for the Orange County school dismict and.38 far the Chapel Hill-Carrbom school district. <br /> Pension veifiest that the increase of nine students is just for this subdivision. This eobdivtvon is <br /> split between the we school districts. <br /> Bryon aquatow that the developer post a sign at dl times that the mad is subject b future <br /> expositor Benedict agreed that this should bean additional confident ofapproval. <br /> Bother asked about the protection of trees above a certain sae. Davis said that cloth tuning was <br /> not allowed w clan with Thee we some specific requirements in the code with regard w the <br /> preservation oflrees. <br /> Tadd asked if there would he a difference in property values since file subdivision is split into <br /> two different towrtedp. Tadd said that the Jilt ce would be more then$5,000 pe acre. She <br /> gave an exmnple of her property,which is in Orange County and is wiling for$20.000 per acre <br /> and The Woodlands,which is m Chapel Hill and u selling for$100,000 an acre. Davies said that <br /> The Weodlanda was more offer developed community. <br /> There was discussion that the subdivision would not be in two separate school districts,only twro <br /> aspirate townships. The entire subdivision is in rte Orange County school crashes <br /> lasru asked ifthis subdivision could become a gated community and Davis said not with politic <br /> reads. <br /> Davis added condition#10 under"Roads and Access'in the Residences of Approved as follows'. <br /> "Signs shall be placed at the and of Tuscany Drive and Front Street,indicating that oath street is <br /> subject to future extension" <br /> A second addW coudlfion was made w the motion-page 18 offl a agenda abstract,Ramp,45 as <br /> follows 'Ifpmposed,a lightning plan for the entire subdivision shall be submitted prior to or <br /> simultaneously with the final plat for approval by Planning staff." <br /> The bond discussed me sire of the signs. The board decided that the sips would be between <br /> three and four squire feet. <br /> MOTION: McAdams moved to accept Item lo,the preliminary Plan,widt the addition of <br /> condition#10 under"Roads and Access"as stated and amended above;and F,#5 as stated above <br /> on any proposed lighting plan. Seconded by louses. <br /> 6 <br />