Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-18-2002 - 9o
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 06-18-2002
>
Agenda - 06-18-2002 - 9o
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2017 3:14:09 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:39:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/18/2002
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9o
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020618
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
38 <br /> R CONAfENDATION(S): StaffRCCOmmevda0on <br /> Approval,in accordance with the attached Resolution of Approval. <br /> Katz askedhowwide themad was and Davis wid20 feenwide. Itisamajorlocalmad. A <br /> minodaaa vi ad would carrier 18 feet wide. <br /> Preston is concerned about the slab out andwhere it would go later. Davis said that the County <br /> does not,on it own,extend roads through other properties. Theamhoulnowgoesto <br /> undeveloped property on both etc east and west <br /> Pmsbn would like to have a map in the borne of the hands se that she can wee better Alias the <br /> owes go. <br /> Pmswn pointed out that the property fags wldtintwo townships—Chapel Hill andBinglom- <br /> and she asked about the futs service. It was answered that it does not have any impact on the fine <br /> service. <br /> Bill Bird,We developer for fins project, said that Hawes Road is aprivate road dust Us 12 lots an <br /> it,which is the madman.allowed. There is no logical way to connect with this road. The most <br /> likely outcome,if any of the wljacen[properties were to be developed,would be to lave the mad <br /> re-wrmect with Arthur Miners Rowl. <br /> Preston asked how much traffic the roads would be subjected to if the five and to ii lots were <br /> developed. Davis said drat it is safer in the uniformed take the extra two feet ofpavemeat for <br /> the roads. The Fire Marshall is pretty adamant shoo[at least planning for another access. <br /> Preswn asked about the HOmcovmdr's Association documents. She would like to see these <br /> documents. <br /> Davis said that the documents were afternoon with the application,and we under review by too <br /> County Attorney. <br /> Rill Bud said Nat the covenants were submitted. He will be living Or this subdivision. He said <br /> that the covenants have very strong language to say that the homeowner's association Can put <br /> Gros on property ifthe dues we not paid or woor requirements era not followed.. <br /> Benedict asked Mr.Bird about the Gutting plan that was mentioned. Mr.Bud said that there <br /> wasno specific Gghtingplanot buthen low emission lighbng for wafaypurposes. Benediets®d <br /> that ifihere is ligber ,it should not have any sky glow. Any light plan should be submitted to <br /> the Planning Department to make sure that there.is an light Pollution. <br /> Davis continued with the presentation and said that the developer has offered to wnstmct a <br /> walking royal rat a our of his Proposal. <br /> Ttiabel asked about the reasoning behind the open space between lots five and win. Davis said <br /> the one ofthe plmming aspeal is that, as you are coming w an intersection,you ne not hooking <br /> straight into someone's house. The audit sp reejusl worked out in this particular place. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.