Agenda - 06-18-2002 - 9m - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ATTACHMENT 2: CPLUC HANDBOOK DRAFT 3. Dispute 3etllemenl Center. The Dispute Settlement Center may be requested to provide a person to facilitate the meetings to ensure the CPLUC's eRectiveness. The facilitator will help suggest methods for use by the CPLUC and will hop keep discussions focused and moving forward. The facilitator will work as pail of the support team In managing the planning process. CPLUC MEETING SCHEDULE AND OUTCOMES 1. Timeline and Meal Content. Below is a brief description and schedule of the CPLUC meetings: June 2002— First Meei Review of current land use condition, analysis of countrywide development trends, and demographic changes. June 2002—Second MaeCnv: Review and discussion on the Potential growth management challenges facing Orange County, including the possible future conditions that may occur(i.e. increased trathc, loss of environment resources, degradation of water quality, and heightened demand on public services). • July 2002—Third Meeting: Review of the various approaches, such as lower densities, to the growth management challenges. Current regulations will also be considered as part of this review. Discussion on the different Growth Scenarios, and the pros and cons of various growth management tools, including Urban Growth Boundaries. • August 2002—Fouts Mesons: Framework of Goals, Objectives. and PolicieslRepod 2. Outcomes. The Committee will provide staff with feedback in writing or through the minutes of the meetings on: The pros and cons of the various growth management tools; • The direction of the Comprehensive Planning Process; and •. The possible need for and discussion points for Small Area Planning Committees and/or meetings. All Comprehensive Planning work products and comments from the Committee shall be forwarded back to the BOCG. 3. Comprehensive Planning Process. Table 2: Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Tentative Process and Schedule illustrates the proposed Comprehensive Planning Process. In scut nto the CPLUC, the process may include Small Area Planning Committees (SAPC). These groups would provide additional feedback about the various growth management tools and their applicability within specific areas of the County from citizens living there. In over to do this,the Planning Staff divided the County into 8 sub- areas based upon watershed, residential density, and utility services. These factors ware chosen because of their influence on the BOCC's goals. Watershed areas are directly related to environmental etewayshm;the presence of utilities and infrastructure is vital to the economic tactic of an area; and the residential density of a community greatly Influences its character.