Browse
Search
Agenda 02-20-24; 6-b - Orange County’s Proposed 2024 Priority Legislative Issues
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
Agenda - 02-20-2024 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 02-20-24; 6-b - Orange County’s Proposed 2024 Priority Legislative Issues
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2024 11:21:01 AM
Creation date
2/15/2024 11:23:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/20/2024
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-b
Document Relationships
Agenda for February 20, 2024 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2024\Agenda - 02-20-2024 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> areas including forests, land in forest succession, scrubland, non-pasture grassland, and <br /> isolated or connected wetlands. Nutrient loads from these areas should not be directly or <br /> indirectly assigned to other source categories. <br /> 7. The revised rules should promote land conservation and preservation of natural or <br /> unmanaged areas as an investment credit. <br /> 8. The revised rules should include a provision for a watershed organization to promote <br /> voluntary coordination of an investment-based,joint-compliance approach. <br /> 9. The revised rules should maintain the annual loading limits specified in the current new <br /> development rule,provide a more flexible evaluation-of-need for stormwater nutrient control <br /> for individual residential lots or for the subdivision of large family parcels for the purposes of <br /> passing land to heirs for building their homes, allow local governments to consider more <br /> innovative approaches to stormwater management, and include joint consultation among <br /> watershed organization members to assess and document consistent application of new <br /> development requirements. <br /> 10. Major and minor wastewater treatment plant owners should continue to optimize treatment <br /> performance using currently installed technologies. Review of plant performance should be <br /> included as a provision of the 25-year review. Plant and collection system owners should <br /> continue to track emerging technologies that may become technically and financially feasible <br /> in the future for further improvements to plant operations and biosolids handling; and <br /> identify and eliminate exfiltration from sewer lines and sanitary sewer overflows. <br /> 11. The revised rules should incorporate requirements for new wastewater treatment facility <br /> requests or expansion requests including provisions for technology upgrades,joint- <br /> compliance permits (e.g., the Lower Neuse Compliance Association's permit), nutrient <br /> offsets, and/or nutrient credit trading using practices on managed lands. <br /> 12. Investment credits should continue to be available for inspecting, identifying, and repairing <br /> or replacing malfunctioning onsite wastewater treatment systems and, as appropriate, for <br /> connecting onsite systems to sewer systems. <br /> 13. Separate, State-required nutrient management requirements should not be applied to <br /> managed lands in separate areas of the watershed(draining to an upstream watershed <br /> impoundment, arms of Falls Lake, etc.). However, water quality in all areas of the watershed <br /> should be tracked,particularly sub-watersheds with water-supply impoundments. The <br /> adaptive management provisions of the revised rules should address changing conditions in <br /> these waterbodies and allow for revisions to the program to address concerns as they arise. <br /> 14. The revised rules should expand the types of projects that qualify for investment credit, <br /> include the option of developing new credit types, and provide opportunity for other <br /> voluntary partners. The revised rules should promote local government participation in other <br /> watershed improvement actions. <br /> 15. The revised rules should encourage local governments to base implementation decisions on <br /> the principles of the fair and equitable treatment of members, and the residents of the <br /> watershed. The revised rules should promote opportunities for equitable stakeholder <br /> participation by encouraging input and participation from the public and interest groups. <br /> 16. The chlorophyll-a standard and water quality 303(d) assessment methodology for Falls Lake <br /> should be adjusted to better represent conditions in Falls Lake. The UNRBA supports an <br /> adjusted 303(d) assessment methodology and site-specific chlorophyll-a standard for Falls <br /> Lake and will continue to cooperate and collaborate with DEQ-DWR, Environmental <br /> Protection Agency(EPA), and other stakeholders on these revisions. The UNRBA does not <br /> recommend delaying rule revisions while these objectives continue to be developed and <br /> evaluated. Readoption of the Falls Lake Rules remains the priority so ongoing <br /> implementation efforts in the watershed can proceed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.