Orange County NC Website
33 <br /> 1 Chair Bedford said that is what the school boards have been advocating for pre-K <br /> 2 classrooms to be removed from capacity. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Slide #7 <br /> WOOLPERT CAPACITY CALCULATIONS <br /> Combined Table of new OREd Projections and <br /> Woolpert Capacity (excluding Pre-K). <br /> Etementwv Schoolis 5334 4575 86% 1 4852 91% <br /> MtddleSchools 2993 1 2716 91% 1 2624 88% <br /> High Schools 3781 1 3974 107% 1 3806 101% <br /> System Total 12028 11265 94% 11282 94% <br /> DREd SY 2034 <br /> Orange Couunty Schools Capacity birollment Percent or Eorallonvil PeFcent oF <br /> Elementary Sdwois 3451 3055 88% 3211 93% <br /> hRM4 Schools 2396 1579 66% 1863 78% <br /> High SchcAs 2678 2382 89% 2779 104% <br /> System Total 8525 7016 82% 7854 92% <br /> Nate.CAPS Threshold Is set(or 105%at Elementary.107%al Middle ORANGE COUNTY <br /> and 110%al High School NOlUrl7 CAROLINA <br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Slide #8 <br /> WO0LPERT CA PAC ITY CA LC U LATI 0 N S <br /> Implications for Bond Planning <br /> • Sufficient Capacity for Consolidation and Swing <br /> Space at Elementary and Middle School levels. <br /> Growth in western part of the county <br /> recommends location near Mebane rather than <br /> renovating existing site. <br /> Possible need to reserve bond capacity for wing <br /> expansions at High School levels. <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> NOWT-1-I CAROLINA <br /> s <br /> 9 Commissioner Fowler asked if the bond capacity is beyond what they already <br /> 10 recommended. <br /> 11 Kirk Vaughn said this would mean that some of the bond might have to go to high school <br /> 12 rather than other priorities. He said that it would not be required but it should be considered. <br />