Browse
Search
Agenda 02-15-24; 2 - Consultant Briefing on Orange County Land Use Plan 2050
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
Agenda - 02-15-2024 Work Session
>
Agenda 02-15-24; 2 - Consultant Briefing on Orange County Land Use Plan 2050
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2024 2:30:36 PM
Creation date
2/8/2024 2:24:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/15/2024
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Agenda for February 15, 2024 Work Session
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2024\Agenda - 02-15-2024 Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> • Hitchhiking is also common at rural nodes like Calvander. The County has historically <br /> "not been in the business of sidewalks." <br /> Enhance Rural Area Assets <br /> • Broadband expansion and reinforcement of broadband infrastructure offers an <br /> opportunity for opening up rural parts of the northern county to development and for <br /> taking advantage of telecommuting opportunities. However, increased services <br /> (broadband or otherwise) to historically rural areas could raise property values to the <br /> point that current residents no longer being able to afford their homes. <br /> • Community septic systems typically face strong regulatory scrutiny, further limiting <br /> alternative development and rural density. These regulatory, inspection, and process <br /> hurdles often prevent landowners from building accessory dwelling units (ADUs) which <br /> are critical to maintaining multigenerational communities and allowing long-time County <br /> residents to age in place. <br /> • Many residents living in northern Orange County do not shop in the county but instead <br /> shop near where they work or in Roxboro or Durham, where it is easier to access and has <br /> less traffic congestion than Hillsborough. <br /> • Connectivity in rural areas of the county is not strong. A road blockage on one road can <br /> create a 20+ minute detour because of a lack of cross-streets between large rural <br /> "blocks". This creates problems for school buses and emergency services vehicles. <br /> • Large local service delivery vehicles have trouble navigating/fitting vehicles on narrow <br /> private rural roads. A discrepancy between the fire code and the zoning ordinance as to <br /> proper road width is one of the sources of this conflict. <br /> Plan with jurisdictional Partners <br /> • The DRCHO Work Group— Durham/Chapel Hill/Orange was a regional planning group <br /> that formerly met and discussed topics of relevance across jurisdictional boundaries. This <br /> model could be considered for other neighboring jurisdictions that share common <br /> interests (regional transit, road infrastructure, land use planning in edge areas, utility <br /> service across boundaries, etc.) <br /> • With the exception of Mebane, utility limitations and growth management controls limit <br /> the amount of potential development in the municipalities. Planning for the remaining <br /> developable areas to achieve the highest and best use is paramount. <br /> • The Rural Buffer and the joint Protection Agreement was built to last. Getting the four <br /> jurisdictions (Hillsborough, Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro) back to the table to <br /> discuss whether or not it should be revised is perceived by almost all stakeholders to be <br /> nearly impossible. Nonetheless, several stakeholders identified opportunities within the <br /> Orange County, North Carolina - Land Use Plan 2050 1 Stakeholder Interviews Summary 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.