2-7-24 PB Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

31 1224 1225 Beth Bronson: You absolutely are. Yes. I guess that's what I mean about these discussions about the 1226 roadways, easement, and things like that, as well as the site plan itself effecting future business. I think we 1227 were just getting very speculative about some of this. It's just that I'm thinking about it as what you have now 1228 moving into it, and huge component of the education and your opportunity to be more of a community leader in 1229 that area because there are a ton of arborists. 1230 1231 Craig Nishimoto: On that, on that recreational stuff, we think it's absurd that people are into rock climbing in 1232 Chapel Hill. Why? There's not rocks. There's a lot of trees. We think it's absurd that when you go into REI, 1233 there's a rock climbing section but no tree climbing section. We want everyone, when they go camping with 1234 their kids, to bring tree climbing gear. We can teach them to do that. So, that's kind of the vision. We're at the 1235 cutting edge. 1236 1237 Beth Bronson: For the 100 foot setback, the moving it to 40 feet, is this on the southern border? 1238 1239 Craig Nishimoto: Yes. 1240 1241 Beth Bronson: Okay, of the Superfund site? 1242 1243 Craig Nishimoto: There are no neighbors there. 1244 1245 Beth Bronson: No. It says it's zoned as residential. 1246 1247 Craig Nishimoto: Well, wait a minute. Let me correct that. Because if you look at the site plan, there's a 1248 place where it's probably within 100 feet on the Duke Forest side too. So yeah. You're right. The Duke Forest 1249 is zoned Rural Buffer, and we might be incurred within that 100 feet. It's just not residential. It never will be. 1250 1251 Ashley Moncado: I can pull the conditions up. Those were the five that were provided in your packet, and 1252 I'm not sure if we're looking at adding a sixth or we would be revising Condition Number 5? 1253 1254 Melissa Poole: The letter was the sixth. 1255 1256 Ashley Moncado: There was the potential to have the BOCC considering an addition of six or that the letter 1257 is a response to five. 1258 1259 Cy Stober: Correct. Ashley is correct. The letter would replace Number 5. 1260 1261 Melissa Poole: So, we've got five. This is a procedural question because when you throw all these at us, 1262 we get mixed up when we've got to make a motion. So, are we doing Attachment 6, the Statement of 1263 Consistency, do we have to do all these individually, or can we put them all together? 1264 1265 Cy Stober: In the statement? 1266 1267 Melissa Poole: In the motion.