Browse
Search
HPC Meeting Summary 12132023
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Historic Preservation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
HPC Meeting Summary 12132023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2024 4:52:54 PM
Creation date
1/29/2024 4:51:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/13/2023
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
HPC Agenda 12132023
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Historic Preservation Commission\Agendas\2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. Preservation of our two Historic Landmark cemeteries: Staff provided an overview of <br /> the current ownership and status of the Old Eno Quaker Burying Ground and the <br /> cemetery at the first site of Harvey's Chapel AME Church. Now that these are landmarks, <br /> our ordinance and state law allow the HPC to take ownership of sites like these if needed <br /> for preservation purposes. For the Quaker Burying Ground, there is no owner of record, <br /> so the first challenge is to clarify its ownership. To move it to county ownership, we will <br /> have to undertake a new updated survey and then we'd have to work with surrounding <br /> property owners to obtain quit claims deeds. Sometime in the future, we'll have to discuss <br /> the matter of providing safe access to this, probably through an easement that we'd have <br /> to purchase from one of the adjoining property owners. The Harvey's Chapel cemetery <br /> has an owner and a current survey. There is access through the adjoining county-owned <br /> land that's part of the Seven Mile Creek Preserve. The church has indicated that they'd <br /> like us to take ownership so that they can be assured that it will be preserved for the long <br /> term. We will need to pay for any survey and necessary legal work. These sites/landmarks <br /> have great significance. There is a general consensus it should be possible and <br /> appropriate to cover these costs with Lands Legacy funding as available. Discussion <br /> followed. Staff noted that the county still needs to work on a Phase I Cultural and <br /> Archeological Survey of the entire Seven Mile property. Dickinson moved to direct staff to <br /> pursue future ownership of both these cemeteries working with Lands Legacy and <br /> perhaps the Eno River Association; seconded by Whisnant; motion passed. Menius noted <br /> that Rufus Jones may have mentioned this Quaker meeting in his major book on Quakers. <br /> c. Annual Report and Work Plan for 2023: Staff referred members to the draft plan. The <br /> areas of our focus are the yellow highlighted sections that address our current <br /> accomplishments for 2023 along with our proposed activities for 2024. This needs to be <br /> updated and submitted to the County Clerk by January 19t". A number of items relate to <br /> our routine activities that don't change much from year to year. Staff walked members <br /> through the document. Discussion followed about several sections. Some type of marker <br /> program is still something that needs more work. There is the ongoing question of <br /> physical or digital markers, or some combination of both. There is a cost of around $2,000 <br /> per marker. A full-blown marker committee will be needed to handle the questions of <br /> accuracy, content and priorities. Whisnant offers to share information about some relevant <br /> digital programs, like Clio and others. Perhaps the Orange County Museum or Visitor's <br /> Bureau might be interested in this topic. There are many complex and sometimes <br /> controversial issues related to a marker program. Peck noted that one of the big projects <br /> for the upcoming 2501" anniversary is to highlight the "Race to the Dan," including highway <br /> markers for this. He is on the state committee. There may be funding associated with that <br /> program that could fund markers related to that era. In general, physical markers are <br /> costly and require maintenance and repairs on an ongoing basis, and also need a safe <br /> place for motorists to pull over. Maybe adjust wording to be more general, say "create <br /> markers or a marker program." Any such program would have to be coordinated with our <br /> municipalities. A marker program that would synergize with other HPC and local activities. <br /> The overarching interest is in having some way to tell the untold story of the <br /> underrepresented communities and their important leaders. For example, there could be a <br /> marker about the Maroon community, without being site-specific to protect the resources. <br /> d. County owned historic building updates: Staff provided a PowerPoint showing the <br /> current state of the WPA-era stone paved sidewalks at the courthouse square and the <br /> Cate Farm, which is owned by the County as part of the site for the future Twin Creeks <br /> Park, on the east side of old 86 just south Eubanks Road. At the courthouse, we are <br /> looking at getting ready to do advance planning and scoping for the bigger project, <br /> perhaps use some of the existing professional funding to do the scoping and budget <br /> development. The Cate Farm consists of a very intact complex of farm buildings mostly <br /> dating from the 1930s and 1940s, all arranged around a very intact c. 1930 Craftsman <br /> Bungalow-style house. The house and buildings were all restored and painted about 12 <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.