Browse
Search
Agenda 01-16-24; 6-a - Affordable Housing Advisory Board (AHAB) Funding Recommendations for FY 2023-24 Affordable Housing Capital Investment Plan (CIP) Funds and Remaining 2016 Bond Funds
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2024
>
Agenda - 01-16-2024 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 01-16-24; 6-a - Affordable Housing Advisory Board (AHAB) Funding Recommendations for FY 2023-24 Affordable Housing Capital Investment Plan (CIP) Funds and Remaining 2016 Bond Funds
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2024 12:46:03 PM
Creation date
1/11/2024 1:47:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/16/2024
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for January 16, 2024 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2024\Agenda - 01-16-2024 Business Meeting
Minutes 01-16-2024 - Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2024
OTHER-2024-003-Service Contract with CRTS, Inc.
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2024
RES-2024-001 Resolution Awarding Funds for the FY 2023-24 Capital Investment Plan Affordable Housing Program
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
27 <br /> Dion and Hasan: Emphasize the need for the board to understand the impacts of partially funding <br /> projects. <br /> Bonnie:Asks if partial HOME funding aids projects. <br /> Erica: Responds that HOME often provides partial funding without issues in past projects. <br /> Kyle: Mentions examples of fully funded projects that still faced delays. Suggests prioritizing <br /> applicants needing funds more. Seeks clarification on Trinity Place applicant. <br /> Holly: Requests identification of the Trinity Place applicant. <br /> Kyle: Identifies Trinity Place as CHP, noting his familiarity due to near involvement in its <br /> development. <br /> Andrew: Argues for funding allocation based on scoring, not deviating significantly from it. <br /> Kyle and Andrew: Request a combined scoring and funding display on an Excel sheet. <br /> Kyle: Proposes specific funding amounts for several projects and a land conveyance. Advocates for <br /> the CASA project but recuses himself from scoring due to involvement. <br /> Hasan: Questions Kyle's involvement in the CASA project. <br /> Kyle: Elaborates on his role in the CASA project. <br /> Erica: Urges further discussion on NOAH's project. <br /> Lynn: Notes that CASA project will be partially funded by CIP funds. <br /> Hasan: Suggests full funding for Cedar Village. <br /> Holly and Andrew: Agree with full funding for Cedar Village, Andrew expresses funding concerns for <br /> other projects. <br /> Kyle: Discusses implications of fully funding Davie Circle on other projects. <br /> Holly and Hasan:Advocate for prioritizing Davie Circle due to potential funding challenges. <br /> Lynn: Expresses frustration over lack of information for decision-making. <br /> Kyle and Lynn: Ask about the possibility of conditional funding. <br /> Bonnie: Clarifies that final funding decisions rest with the BOCC. <br /> Holly: Concerns about inadequate support for non-new construction projects impacting affordable <br /> housing. <br /> Lynn: Proposes funding for Empowerment projects,with remaining funds to CASA Homestead <br /> Horizons. <br /> Andrew: Suggests explaining any deviations from scoring in funding decisions. <br /> Bonnie: Inquires about remaining funds. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.