Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
25 <br /> Kyle: Pointed out the impact of larger projects over smaller ones when considering cost per unit. RFP <br /> Creation and Review <br /> Lynn: Suggested collaboration between the board and staff for the next RFP due to existing <br /> confusion. <br /> Bonnie: Agreed to have the board review the next RFP,which she has revised. <br /> c) Discussion on Empowerment(Wentworth) <br /> Kyle: Asks if this should be included since it was just for land conveyance. <br /> Bonnie: Explains that this RFP includes land conveyance. <br /> Lynn: Asks for clarification on Wentworth building plans. <br /> Erica: Explains the Wentworth building plans. <br /> Kyle: Explains that he did not give Wentworth high scores on the leveraging section because many of <br /> the fields were not applicable, also explains special needs scoring confusion. <br /> d) Discussion on CHT <br /> Kyle: Expresses that he scored CHT higher than other members. <br /> e) Discussion on CASA(Cedar Village) <br /> Lynn: Praised the project's location and cost-to-unit ratio. <br /> Holly: Noted changes in the project's scope over time. <br /> f) Discussion on Habitat for Humanity <br /> Kyle: Explained his higher scoring for Habitat, particularly in the leveraging section. <br /> Lynn: Expressed a desire for more emphasis on environmental sustainability in project scoring. <br /> g) Discussion on CASA(Homestead) <br /> Kyle: Asks if the scoring for leveraging is low due to the amount of county funds being requested. <br /> Lynn: Confirms this is why they scored low in the leveraging section, Explains this would be part of <br /> the larger homestead project. <br /> Kyle: Voices his concerns about the homestead project due to CASA's finances <br /> h) Discussion on Empowerment(Davie Circle) <br /> Erica: Highlighted that this is a NOAH project, seeking clarity on future scoring for such projects. <br /> Kyle: Agrees with Erica that it is important the board score NOAH's move favorably moving forward, <br /> Commented on the low building design score due to the project's existing structure and lack of <br /> renovation plans. <br />