Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
24 <br /> Bonnie: I made a mistake on the AMI portion when I drafted the form and someone caught that <br /> correct? <br /> Erica:Yes,Thomas and I caught and corrected that. <br /> Lynn: Does anyone have more questions about allocating percentage of units? <br /> Kyle: Clarifies his approach scoring AMI percentage. <br /> Erica: The 45 should have also included the special needs population. <br /> Andrew: Expresses concern with scoring and states that we need to fix scoring matrix moving <br /> forward in order to avoid the problems. <br /> Kyle: I thought it was very helpful the way that you guys broke up the three different empowerment <br /> projects. <br /> Bonnie:Travis do you want to provide some clarification on how we scored applicants that used <br /> county land? <br /> Travis: Applicants using a county parcel,that site control is pretty much guaranteed so they should <br /> score perfectly on that metric. <br /> a) Discussion on Final Scores <br /> Mary: expresses her surprise with leveraging being 20 points below. <br /> Kyle: I believe CHP should be the top of the list because it's shovel ready.They can start building it <br /> immediately. So I agree that it should have scored the highest. <br /> Andrew: States that he agrees, it makes sense for CHP to be at the top of the list because they are <br /> shovel ready. <br /> Hasan: I agree with Kyle, shovel ready is really important to me. <br /> b) Discussion on Pee Wee Homes <br /> Travis: Explained the role of leveraging in the scorecard and the importance of external funding. <br /> Lynn: Noted that many Pee Wee Homes project elements in the leveraging section are not <br /> applicable. <br /> Holly: Voiced her support for Pee Wee Homes' high score. <br /> Hasan: Raised concerns about the income targeting category possibly inflating Pee Wee Homes' <br /> score. <br />