Orange County NC Website
Proposed Access and Transportation Network Improvements <br />The Project is proposing access via the existing access easement to Millhouse Road. Based on the <br />application and total number of trips to be generated, a TIA was not required per Section 6.18.2 of the <br />UDO. <br />A Grant of Easement and Assignment of Lease for the existing access easement within the property was <br />recorded in 2008 between the property owner at that time and Crown Castle. Attachment 5 includes a <br />letter detailing the applicant’s legal right to the access easement, which cannot be confirmed by staff at this <br />time. However, the county conducted deed and title research on this property in 2008, when it was a <br />potential purchaser of the property. The county determined that Crown Castle retains a perpetual <br />easement on the property for access to their tower that grants them explicit rights to construct and <br />maintain their tower and first rights of refusal if all or a portion of the easement area is sold. Crown Castle <br />has not provided comment on this application despite requests from both the applicant and County <br />Planning staff. <br />The existing offsite access easement is located on property owned by Orange County. Due to the <br />aforementioned access concerns, and in response to the proposed use of the existing easement as a <br />commercial driveway to serve the applicant’s use, the County, specifically the Department of Environment, <br />Agriculture, Parks & Recreation (DEAPR), requested a condition of future access road construction <br />through its property from the applicant and the applicant has not agreed to the request. The applicant’s <br />response to DEAPR’s request is contained in Attachment 5. <br />As found in correspondence from DEAPR (Attachment 5), the request outlines the following: <br />If this proposed rezoning were approved, the County as landowner of the future park site that <br />contains the access easement would request that the applicant be required to work with the County <br />and the tower owner to reroute the access easement / new commercial driveway, to minimize the <br />isolation of sections of the future park and the resultant safety issues that would exist if the current <br />location were kept. <br />Given the fact that the construction of the facility is planned to be less than five years away, we <br />would not be inclined to pursue the interim solution you offered using the current access location. <br />We believe that all would be best served by addressing the needed relocation of the access sooner <br />rather than later. <br /> <br />Summary of Transportation Information <br />Existing Roadway Characteristics <br />Affected Roadway Millhouse Road <br />Type of Roadway Local – 2 lane undivided <br />Current Roadway Capacity 10,000 <br />Latest Traffic Volume Estimated 2,500 <br />Traffic Generation <br />Number of Trips Expected to be Generated by <br />Proposed Project <br />308 Total Daily <br />107 Total AM Peak <br />107 Total PM Peak <br /> <br />Proposed Utilities <br />Water and wastewater services will be provided via a private well and septic system that meet Orange <br />County Environmental Health standards. <br /> <br />72