Browse
Search
1-3-24 PB Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2024
>
1-3-24 PB Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2023 5:01:06 PM
Creation date
12/22/2023 4:59:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/3/2024
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
1.3.24 Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />To: Ashley Moncado, Planner III, Planning and Inspections Department <br /> <br />From: Peter Sandbeck, Cultural Resources Coordinator, DEAPR <br /> <br />Date: October 20, 2023 <br /> <br />Re: MA23-0003 The Treeist Conditional Rezoning Application <br /> <br />Thank you for providing the Agricultural Preservation Board (APB) with the opportunity to review and <br />comment on the proposal from Acer LLC to rezone 10.01 acres (PIN 9871503254) from the RB, Rural <br />Buffer zoning district to ASE-CD, Agricultural Support Enterprises Conditional District for agricultural <br />services uses. These comments are being provided according to the provisions of Section 2.8.5 of the <br />Orange County Unified Development Ordinance, which stipulates that the application shall be provided to <br />the Agricultural Preservation Board for review and comment. <br /> <br />Summary of APB Comments: <br /> <br />Vehicle activity: the application should accurately reflect a realistic estimate of the proposed vehicle <br />activity, both for crew members individually going to and from work, and for the truck traffic, both crew <br />trucks and timber carrying trucks. <br /> <br />Site plantings: members felt that it was going to be important to have adequate site plantings to properly <br />screen the somewhat industrial nature of this operation. <br /> <br />Tree service: members wanted to be sure that a tree service operation qualifies under the general <br />definition of agriculture, and thus that this does not set a precedent for any future such applications. <br /> <br />Mulch and chip production: members felt that this was a positive aspect, as this appears to be a byproduct <br />of this business and that there is a good market for these byproducts and that seems to fall into the <br />category of an agricultural enterprise. <br /> <br />In summary, APB members were generally comfortable with the application and didn’t offer any other <br />concerns. They expressed general agreement that this appears to be a viable use for this particular parcel, <br />given the uses and ownership of the adjoining parcels. <br /> <br />Please contact me if you have any questions at 245-2517. <br />115
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.