2023-11-29 BOER MINUTES - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

DocuSign Envelope ID:933E4266-2573-4AB4-A69C-88B2E89AC78E signed the 2003 application understanding that loss of eligibility will result in removal from the program and the immediate billing of deferred taxes. • On July 6,2023,Ms. Petty received a Present Use Value Compliance Review form in the mail to complete for her two properties enrolled in the program since March 3,2003. Ms. Petty and her nephew Mr. Holden visited the assessor's office in the month of August and inquired how to complete the compliance review received. I provided maps of the tract containing the two parcels enrolled in the program with aerial photographs to conclude the amount of open land in production to be less than the required amount needed of 10 acres. • On Sept. 15,2023,1 removed the two parcels enrolled in the program due to the property no longer meeting the minimum acreage in production requirement for agriculture. • Appeal Letter dated Oct. 11, 2023 • Removal of Present Use Value Letter dated Sept. 15,2023 • Aerial maps of two properties with measured open land in production acreage • Present Use Value Compliance Review Letter dated July 6, 2023 • Original 2003 AV-5 Application for Agriculture dated March 3,2003 Motion of the Board Uphold removal of property from Present Use Value Program. Board of Equalization and Review does not have authority to release deferred taxes Made the motion Barbara Levine Seconded the motion Leon Meyers Voted For Voted Against Property Identification: Property Owner Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Appellant(if different) Chicken Property Address Business Personal Parcel ID or Abstract 3204522 Property located at 237 S. Elliott Road Statement of Appeal: Request the compromise of taxes in the amount of$1,124.28 for listing penalty. Current Assessed Value N/A County Opinion Applied listing penalty of $1,124.28 Time of Hearing 1:47 PM Appellant Opinion Compromise of taxes for $1,124.28 in listing penalty County Representative Christy Carden Board Decision Deny the request for compromise of taxes Evidence submitted by the appellant: • The accounting firm is requesting compromise of late list penalty due to an oversight by their firm at listing time. The listing was completed immediately upon discovery and tax will be paid timely.