Browse
Search
Agenda 12-04-23; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2023
>
Agenda - 12-04-2023 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 12-04-23; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2023 11:11:27 AM
Creation date
11/30/2023 10:59:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/4/2023
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for December 4, 2023 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2023\Agenda - 12-04-2023 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
33 <br /> 1 engagement consultant would be making sure that they do not go back on the decisions that <br /> 2 have been made up to this point. <br /> 3 Commissioner Fowler asked if the design team would present the design to the group. <br /> 4 Cy Stober said the engagement consultant would have the dual responsibility of <br /> 5 representing the public entities they have contracted with but also representing the Rogers <br /> 6 Road input and values are reflected in in the design. <br /> 7 Commissioner Greene said everyone in the Town of Chapel Hill meeting said they <br /> 8 wanted to lower the cost. She said that the presentation at Chapel Hill was 14 months. <br /> 9 Travis Myren asked Cy Stober if the discrepancy in time included the design work. <br /> 10 Cy Stober said it does and the four months of presentations to the three bodies. He said <br /> 11 if there is a need to present to the Planning Board, this also ensures there is enough lead time <br /> 12 to do that. <br /> 13 Commissioner Greene said to summarize what she heard in Chapel Hill, they said they <br /> 14 wanted to make sure they were not starting over, and they wanted to ensure that they were <br /> 15 talking about what type of housing to put there. She said they discussed how the process would <br /> 16 work in tandem with the design process. She said that Chapel Hill was fine with it, except they <br /> 17 said lower the cost and shorten the time frame. She said she is hopeful that if the scope is <br /> 18 reduced, that it might shorten the time frame. <br /> 19 Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked how they would use the feedback they have received <br /> 20 from the community and how that has been ranked. <br /> 21 Cy Stober said the intention is to use the work and plans that have been done to create <br /> 22 a plan of where attributes would be located. He said the community consultant would ensure <br /> 23 that all the work already done is represented and when they finetune the detail, that the streets <br /> 24 and land use reflect those wishes. He said it is really working to get a detailed master plan. <br /> 25 Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked if the housing would serve the four priority <br /> 26 populations, or if it would serve any population that needs housing. <br /> 27 Commissioner Greene said the details of the mix of the housing was still on the table. <br /> 28 Bonnie Hammersley said the mix would be decided by the three partners. She said that <br /> 29 managing expectations is important. She said she is concerned that the $360,000 option would <br /> 30 override the work that has already been done and they do not know who those partners would <br /> 31 be. She said that it might also slow the process down. She said that the three owners need to <br /> 32 start making decisions about the road. She said they do not need to ask the community about <br /> 33 Purefoy and a four-lane highway, but the owners can start making decisions. <br /> 34 Vice-Chair McKee said he is not really sure what they are trying to do with the <br /> 35 community engagement consultant. He said he is always concerned about unintended <br /> 36 consequences. He asked if the decision is the county's and the county's only. He said that it is <br /> 37 concerning that the towns support their entering into the contract. <br /> 38 Bonnie Hammersley said that the county would be administering the contract, and the <br /> 39 other jurisdictions would pay the county. <br /> 40 Vice-Chair McKee said the wording is a little bit off. He said he agrees with everything <br /> 41 the manager just said. He said he felt like it was opening it back up for another 12 years of <br /> 42 discussion. He said he didn't understand what they were buying for$270,000. <br /> 43 Cy Stober said that the presence would be dedicated staff to the project and the <br /> 44 community to provide dialogue with the community and receive input. He said the intention of <br /> 45 staff is to ensure that the project is successful and to do that expeditiously. He said staff feels <br /> 46 that having a third party would provide a resource of communication, for feedback and updates, <br /> 47 and would have someone dedicated to that purpose. He said as planners, it is important that <br /> 48 they have an ethical interest in representing the needs of the Rogers Road community. He said <br /> 49 the Greene Tract is not new to him and it is exciting to be part of that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.